top | item 13845768

Show HN: 288 Analog Clocks Give Digital Time

117 points| MichaelHoste | 9 years ago |clocks.80limit.com

34 comments

order
[+] chrisjshull|9 years ago|reply
I'd love to see a version of this that didn't go through a "random" phase every few seconds. I'd love to see the actual transitions between the times. I think it would be more subtle, but more elegant. (You might be able to add seconds display to the clock if you wanted it to be more active.)
[+] MichaelHoste|9 years ago|reply
I was indeed afraid that it would look too static without using "random" phases. Using seconds would be great (I could try to make them look smaller too).

Looking at my source of inspiration (http://www.humanssince1982.com/a-million-times/) you can see that the random phases are way prettier than mine. But it would make the code uglier with a lot of "setTimeout"s, and I wanted to keep it clean.

[+] dexterdog|9 years ago|reply
It would make a nice screen clock if it actually showed the time most of the time. Instead most times when you look at it to see what time it is you have to wait. At that point you're pulling your phone out of your pocket and next thing you know you're reading HN and wasting time.
[+] GavinMcG|9 years ago|reply
This is a design piece, inspired by a gallery exhibition that did something similar, but mechanically.

The creator is in this thread and can speak for himself on this, but complaining about it not being a clock you'd actually use really doesn't contribute much.

[+] Someone|9 years ago|reply
Those aren't analog clocks. Analog clocks don't have a state where both hands of the clock are horizontal, or where one is pointing south and the other pointing east or west.
[+] vanderreeah|9 years ago|reply
They're not even clocks, in that they don't individually keep time. But that's not the point, is it. I think it's a nice project.
[+] biot|9 years ago|reply
It is if you allow for rotation of the hands as well as rotating the entire clock itself. If a clock showing 6:00 is rotated 90 degrees you get horizontal hands. Similarly for rotating a clock that shows 3:00 or 9:00.
[+] Entangled|9 years ago|reply
Nice trick, you're only using six hours to show the time: four corners, horizontal and vertical. The rest is just random movement to make it look like a complex machine.

Kudos.

[+] stevefeinstein|9 years ago|reply
It takes about 15 seconds for the clock to cycle. Only three of these seconds are spent actually showing the time. So if I want to know the time I need to sit and wait typically about 10 seconds before I'll know what time it is. It's cool, but it's upside down. It needs to be a clock first, then cool.
[+] flogic|9 years ago|reply
That depends on whether it's priority is to be a clock or a piece of art first. As an artwork, it more than succeeds. In it's current form, prioritizing art seems the correct choice. It takes up a fair chunk of screen real estate. It's the kind of thing you pop up for a bit and look at as a novelty. To be primarily a clock, it will need a more dedicated display. Even if that's just an LCD monitor connected to a Raspberry PI.
[+] kwhitefoot|9 years ago|reply
Clever but the clocks aren't really analogue. In an analogue clock the movement is continuous and there is no state where both hands are horizontal

But still, it really is clever.

[+] ythn|9 years ago|reply
Are the "analog" clocks actually analog? Seems like they just transition between discrete states based on the current (digital) time.

Still, mesmerizing visualization.

[+] S_A_P|9 years ago|reply
Agree. I was initially expecting the "analog" clocks to show the time and he arranged in a way that they formed the digital time. I do think it's cool to look at though
[+] theoh|9 years ago|reply
I think that counts as analog, because the hands of the clocks are a continously variable indication. Even if they move in increments of 90 degrees, what's happening in the clock involves measurement, not just counting. That makes it at least partly analog.
[+] Applejinx|9 years ago|reply
They're clock shaped things, but not actual clocks, just discs with two indicator hands. Pretty tho :)
[+] jimnotgym|9 years ago|reply
Well I thought it was beautiful and, the real test, my children agree
[+] orless|9 years ago|reply
Would be interesting to see a "digital text" version to display short text messages the same way.
[+] rongway|9 years ago|reply
If you look at it long enough, some of the analog clocks start twitching
[+] knqyf263|9 years ago|reply
I want to display this on the iPad and put it in the room.
[+] Y_Y|9 years ago|reply
Why say "over 280" when you could just say 288?
[+] MichaelHoste|9 years ago|reply
I have no idea, the title changed after I posted it and it was "288". It was also originally a "Show HN:" but someone removed it (maybe I was using it wrong, I don't know).
[+] bbcbasic|9 years ago|reply
Learn to tell the time with these 288 weird clocks