(no title)
tnorgaard | 9 years ago
ECC is a nice to have, but ZFS does not have special requirement over say a regular page cache. The only difference is that ZFS will discovery bit-flips instead of just ignoring them as ext4 or xfs would do.
tnorgaard | 9 years ago
ECC is a nice to have, but ZFS does not have special requirement over say a regular page cache. The only difference is that ZFS will discovery bit-flips instead of just ignoring them as ext4 or xfs would do.
3legcat|9 years ago
Actually it seems ECC is important for ZFS filesystems see:
http://louwrentius.com/please-use-zfs-with-ecc-memory.html
solarengineer|9 years ago
Thus, if one is using ZFS for data reliability, one ought to use ECC memory as well.
gbrown_|9 years ago
The inflection made by the previous comment tends to lead people to think ECC RAM is needed for ZFS specifically. As the blog post you link to points out it's equally applicable to all filesystems.
blablabloe|9 years ago
h2hn|9 years ago
That's rigth the kind of hardware I was referring to, 1 GB of plain RAM. Truly, I haven't tested ZFS yet for that reason I've always read that ZFS has big requirements so I refrained to try it. It seems I should give it a try. ;)
Btrfs is another story I've used it for years and I'd prefer not to have to use it anymore untill it'll become "stable" and "performance". :)
Laforet|9 years ago