top | item 13860139 (no title) mlmlmasd | 9 years ago > There's simply too much data that isn't public.Make it public? discuss order hn newest jandrese|9 years ago The danger of making it public is that it makes the system much easier to game.The upside is that it is easier to see who is gaming the system. Or that could be another downside if the answer is "the moderators". mlmlmasd|9 years ago How does it make the system easier to game?> Or that could be another downside if the answer is "the moderators".To me it seems like an upside if we know when moderators are gaming the system. load replies (1) late2part|9 years ago Security through obscurity is rarely a winning tactic. load replies (3) danmaz74|9 years ago That makes gaming the system too easy.
jandrese|9 years ago The danger of making it public is that it makes the system much easier to game.The upside is that it is easier to see who is gaming the system. Or that could be another downside if the answer is "the moderators". mlmlmasd|9 years ago How does it make the system easier to game?> Or that could be another downside if the answer is "the moderators".To me it seems like an upside if we know when moderators are gaming the system. load replies (1) late2part|9 years ago Security through obscurity is rarely a winning tactic. load replies (3)
mlmlmasd|9 years ago How does it make the system easier to game?> Or that could be another downside if the answer is "the moderators".To me it seems like an upside if we know when moderators are gaming the system. load replies (1)
jandrese|9 years ago
The upside is that it is easier to see who is gaming the system. Or that could be another downside if the answer is "the moderators".
mlmlmasd|9 years ago
> Or that could be another downside if the answer is "the moderators".
To me it seems like an upside if we know when moderators are gaming the system.
late2part|9 years ago
danmaz74|9 years ago