[mlmlmasd]

> most of us agree that there is no level of groping that's acceptable; whereas I _think_ that, even among those of us who would like a web with no ads, the position that there is no level of advertising that's acceptable is extreme.

Holy shit, could you not come up with a more loaded and ambiguous way of trying to justify ads?

> Nonetheless, since some people do use it, surely this divestiture from a conflict of interest is a good thing, even if it's not perfect.

What are you talking about? Google literally pays ABP to not block some of their ads.