I don't understand how they can still go through with this. As far as I've been following the analytics, news and coverage on this, the outcomes for UK are only negative. Can please someone enlighten me the good outcomes that will come out of this? Or is this really just about pride and stupidity?
Brendinooo|9 years ago
I'm not from the UK, but my impression was that for many it wasn't about economic optimization, it was also about the notion of freedom - being less intertwined with the EU (and thus its regulations, economics, security concerns, etc.). Immigration was probably an issue as well.
If freedom was the issue, you get the freedom and work out the consequences later. Some people would rather feel like their nation has more control over their destiny, even if that destiny isn't as comfortable as it could have been under someone else's control.
I would also contend that as long as Brexit hasn't happened, there are plenty of forces that would want to keep the status quo and would therefore try to project as much negativity as possible.
Also, I'm not an economist, futurist, or a stockbroker (so one can correct me if I'm wrong), but humans aren't always great at predicting things in these areas. So it's not fair to assume that there is no positive outcome.
pavlov|9 years ago
That is an illusory kind of freedom because you can't turn the clock back. Reducing trade with the EU would be a loss for everyone. If the UK breaks from EU norms and enacts its own regulatory frameworks, that just means more overhead for companies that want to operate there... And so on.
The English habit of blaming Europe for regulations has always puzzled me, because pre-EU Britain was in many ways a bureaucrats' paradise. The number of civil servants peaked in the mid-1970s and has been declining since.
From what I've heard, just getting a telephone line in '70s England could be a nightmare. There's a lot of things that are so much better today thanks to a pan-European competitive environment and free trade. Imagine if Britain had created its own mobile phone standard instead of going with the European GSM. That would have been more "independent", but to no benefit at all.
A lot of things post-Brexit will end up like that: it's just easiest for everyone if Britain tags along with the EU standards rather than reinvents the wheel -- only Britain won't have a say in the processes anymore.
moomin|9 years ago
Anecdotally, I've spoken to a number of Leavers who talk about taking back control (most of them also believe immigration is a problem). They tend to be working class and feel that the government doesn't listen to them. I really seriously doubt this vote will make a blind bit of difference on that front.
pjc50|9 years ago
https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/01/dominic-cummings-brexi...
(We really need a good word for "forward-looking statements that are really unlikely to be true"; not quite lies, but very highly misleading. If Brexit was a form of insurance it would be the mis-selling scandal of the century.)
Balgair|9 years ago
corney91|9 years ago
The two objectives the government are aiming to please "the will of the people" with are limiting immigration from the EU and to regain sovereignty.
The deceit is that immigration provides more benefits to the UK than costs (https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/nov/05/eu-migrants-...) and our parliament is already sovereign (the ironic proof being that they're the ones deciding we're leaving the EU).
TheOtherHobbes|9 years ago
They think politics is a football match. Their team won the match and now they're oh so happy.
May is playing to that base. But she's using them to pursue far-right extremist Tory policy - which means the end of the welfare state, the end of affordable public health insurance, the end of free education, and so on.
A small cabal of business insiders, including not a few US corporations, stand to profit mightily from all this, even though it will leave most of the population in permanent financial insecurity and/or catastrophic debt.
Of course it's nonsense, and will turn the UK into some kind of fascist North Korea for a decade or so.
The EU is the only organisation that has some interest, no matter how patchy (sorry Greece...), in maintaining humane government and corporate oversight across most of the region.
With the EU out of the picture, the radical neoliberalisation of England can proceed at full speed. (Scotland will probably leave, Ireland will turn back into a mess, Wales is making noises about leaving, so is London, and so to a much lesser extent are some of the regions.)
Most of the people who voted for Brexit will be horribly damaged by this, but by the time they realise they've been conned it will be too late.
a_name|9 years ago
>It would if the report was comprehensive. It isn't. It ignored housing benefit in private rentals. Housing benefit budget is £25b per year.
>It doesn't look at child benefit or break down tax credits.
>It doesn't include costs of increased school places (£5 billion additional allocated for this) nor health costs.
>The data is does use is not comprehensive from govt departments but a survey. Fact is we don't know all the costs as many are not recorded.
using the Guardian to back up a left leaning idea is like quoting The Daily Mail to back up a right leaning idea.
corford|9 years ago
Those same sceptics are now running government policy and wont be satisfied with anything short of a full, hard separation from Europe. They've waited 30+ years for this and are hell-bent on finally achieving it, rest of the country be damned.
It's going to be a long, sad car crash and, with no effective domestic political opposition in sight, I hope Europe has the balls to make it as difficult for us as possible. The faster the country hits rock bottom the faster we can have a wholesale purge of the UK political class and start again.
cmdkeen|9 years ago
louthy|9 years ago
Because there was a referendum where a majority decided it was what they wanted. The Government is hell bent on doing it for ideological reasons. The Opposition believe they are following the 'will of the people'. It's a shit state of affairs, but I don't see how it can be averted now, unless there is enough political pressure over the next two years to hold a referendum on the final deal.
orph4nus|9 years ago
AndrewDucker|9 years ago
Even a 15% swing from Conservative to UKIP would destroy most of the party, due to the awfulness of the FPTP voting system.
And the Conservative leadership won't risk that.
naaaaak|9 years ago
Most news is pure propaganda. All of the so-called "news" (BBC, etc.) has a vested interest in keeping the status quo. They've tried to brainwash people how Brexit would instantly collapse the econ (didn't happen, did it) and they are continuing that route.
Don't fall for their lies. More self-control is not pride and stupidity.
atirip|9 years ago
I may be just silly, but Brexit hasn't happened yet.
gadders|9 years ago
The EU was asked to reform to accommodate those nations that don't want ever closer union and to become part of a European super-state, but they chose not to change.
Angostura|9 years ago
naaaaak|9 years ago
We call that a functioning democracy. The EU is the opposite of that.
EU: "You have to accept our way, even if you don't want it and it's bad for your country. It's for the good of our global group."
mathw|9 years ago
48% of those who voted voted to Remain 52% of those who voted voted to Leave 28% of the electorate didn't bother to vote
But "the will of the people", "the people have spoken". A good few million didn't bother to say anything at all (I do not find myself thinking generously of this at all, it was the most important vote most of us will ever see), and the gap between leave and remain is a hardly-unanimous 4%. If this was representative, nearly half the MPs should be arguing against leaving the EU.
But as you say, few MPs want to say it because they're terrified they're going to lose their jobs next election.
hyperdunc|9 years ago
However, reforming the EU political structure would be preferable to leaving.
cmdkeen|9 years ago
The EU is fundamentally irreformable to reduce its power, it is the modern embodiment of Whig history - the view that progress is inevitable towards every greater liberty and enlightenment. This is the sort of attitude that leads to things like Greece being allowed to join the Euro when it was patently unready to do so.
One of the things you need to remember about the older people who tended to vote Leave is that they either voted in or remember the circumstances of the initial EU referendum in the UK. They remember what the UK joined and how it was presented to the UK. Other European countries with a much more recent history of revolution or dictatorship might want to remove power away from themselves, that is a view that is much more at odds with how Britain perceives itself.
agd|9 years ago
catdog|9 years ago
merraksh|9 years ago
michaelbrooks|9 years ago
imron|9 years ago
I'm not from the UK and neither for or against Brexit, but what good is a petition with 100,000 signatures when they'd just had a referendum with 17.4 million people voting 'leave'. [0]
Considering most of the signatures would have been people who voted to 'remain', in what world does it make sense for a 100,000 signature petition to overturn a referendum with a 1.3 million vote difference?
Even assuming those 100,000 signatures were all from former 'leave' voters switching sides, it would only change the result to be 17.3 million vs 16.2 million. A difference of 1.1 million.
0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brexit#Referendum_result
UK-AL|9 years ago
london888|9 years ago
Those who voted for Brexit (including 2 in my family) didn't think it through.
user5994461|9 years ago
As far as I'm following the media. All the companies I worked with stopped recruiting and some even shut down their London offices entirely.
Meanwhile, work as usual at the same places. If only we had a law department to sue them and get these fake news removed.
rmc|9 years ago
bobbington|9 years ago
[deleted]