[rustynails]

Neural to me means stop favouring one special interest group over everybody else. When the NYT was seeking to hire a gender editor (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/jobs/nyt-gender-edi...) and said "women ruled the Olympics", "men used to dominate", etc. were they impartial? Was there any need for such divisiveness? What did they hope to gain?

The special interest groups will move into Facebook. They will shut down anything they don't like and allow everything (no matter how intolerant) that aligns with their political agenda. Use "domestic violence" as an example by searching that term at Google. Almost all publications ignore worldwide government stats that show huge numbers of female perpetrators. Almost all media outlets say domestic violence is something only males do and only females are victims of, in spite of overwhelming evidence this is false. That's an example of non neutrality by a special interest group. It's lead to a starvation of funding and support for one sex. It's lead to animosity.

Do you think Facebook will be impartial in their moderation? The special interest groups will apply extreme pressure and the result will be extreme views.