top | item 14299051

Shrinkray: Lightweight alternative to Electron

41 points| letalvoj | 9 years ago |github.com | reply

8 comments

order
[+] cshepp|9 years ago|reply
I'm not sure that you can call this an "alternative" to Electron if it only supports macOS. I think the main selling point of Electron is the ability to build cross-platform GUI apps, which Shrinkray doesn't provide.
[+] pawadu|9 years ago|reply
Remember when you could only download OSX executables from the Atom home page [1]?

In my experience, projects that are OSX first often work horribly on other platforms (the poster child being itunes). Hence I switched to Visual Studio Code the second it became available.

[1] they gave you build instructions for linux & windows. Which almost never worked.

[+] prophesi|9 years ago|reply
How does this compare with Electrino, which was on top of Hacker News a few days ago? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14260755

And I have to agree with other commenters that this will only truly be an alternative if it could be cross-platform. It seems cross-platform support is possible (by using each OS's own browser runtime), but then you'd have discrepancies between platforms which takes us back to square one.

[+] hackcasual|9 years ago|reply
Electrino is also only macOS at this point
[+] AshleysBrain|9 years ago|reply
As far as I can tell it's just a web view wrapper for desktop. It's missing all the node features that Electron or NW.js add, which makes me wonder... why not just run it in a browser like normal?
[+] ishtu|9 years ago|reply
It is not lightweight, it just takes less disk space.
[+] kitsunesoba|9 years ago|reply
WebKit is generally easier on resources than Chromium/Blink is, sometimes to the tune of multiple hours longer battery life. So while it's still not lightweight, it's more lightweight than Electron is.
[+] david90|9 years ago|reply
Seems that we start to find Electron heavy-weight a problem.