[tps5]

You're entitled to your opinion, but posting that thesis and saying it's "more truthful" is tremendously silly.

You should be able to understand that it's a hypothesis you find convincing without evangelizing it as "truthful."

[AnimalMuppet]

More: You should recognize that it's a hypothesis that many (most?) historians do not find convincing. (Which does not mean that CriticalSection's hypothesis is any more convincing; they both sound like revisionist history to me, just written by apologists for different monsters.)