top | item 14376918 (no title) saywatnow | 8 years ago > note how the second expression has no "z" variable in it.A better comparison would be to func2(1 + 2 + 3, func1(x, y)); discuss order hn newest jerf|8 years ago Both are idiomatic in their own domain. Obviously I'm not trying to token-golf or neither would have 1 + 2 + 3 in it. WalterBright|8 years ago The parentheses are redundant as well, if the code was reordered.Haskell eliminates the ( ) for function arguments. While Haskellers like this, I find it makes the code very hard to read.
jerf|8 years ago Both are idiomatic in their own domain. Obviously I'm not trying to token-golf or neither would have 1 + 2 + 3 in it.
WalterBright|8 years ago The parentheses are redundant as well, if the code was reordered.Haskell eliminates the ( ) for function arguments. While Haskellers like this, I find it makes the code very hard to read.
jerf|8 years ago
WalterBright|8 years ago
Haskell eliminates the ( ) for function arguments. While Haskellers like this, I find it makes the code very hard to read.