Interestingly the only differences between Apoe4 and a neutral, very common variant called ApoE3 is one amino acid at position 112. The small variance appears to account for most of the negative effect of the ApoE4 genotype.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28533891
TLDR: "Aging is the major risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease though the advent of Alzheimer’s disease within a normal human lifespan is suggested to be brought about through human exposure to aluminum. Essentially without aluminum in brain tissue there would be no Alzheimer’s disease."
Wait, didn't aluminun used to be much more rare in the past, yet we still had Alzheimer's cases? Or are we assuming things in the past were Alzheimer's without good evidence?
Edit: Removed question about exposure, since it was answered in parent.
More Redflags
- A paper that doesn't have any experimental data
- A single author paper (nobody to collaborate with)
- A paper that uses many of the the author's previous papers as references
An editorial in a journal that no one ever heard of by an author from an also-ran university. In medical research you can really only trust meta-studies, because attempts to find a simple cause for any complex disease are legion, and usually wrong.
Have any of you guys ever written or read scientific papers before? This is a pretty poorly written article and I'm surprised it has so many upvotes. It's a bold headline, but the article itself makes many logical leaps that are pretty sensational and unfounded.
Overall I'd say this is a pretty garbage article and that we shouldn't be upvoting it so much / only reading the headline and accepting it as fact.
This is a no-name journal with no reputation (positive or negative) that I can find. The aluminum hypothesis is widely rejected by mainstream researchers for pretty good reasons. User nilved posted a link to a comprehensive paper explaining why (go upvote them).
Please remember to be be skeptical of links like this. Being in "a journal" is not a high bar.
Aluminum cans are lined with BPA (polymer) .. not likely that this is a major vector. See Table 1.3 here[1] for a discussion of some sources, although it does not cover cans, pots and pans, or foil.
It is interesting how the editorial talks about perspiration being a natural way for the body to excrete aluminum, while aluminum is the active ingredient in most anti-perspirants. So we are effectively blocking the release of aluminum by using aluminum.
I think the interesting part is that if you are not exercising regularly, you're not perspiring and hence blocking a major channel to excrete aluminum.
Diet and exercise, folks. I wouldn't worry about the aluminum in your deodorant - make sure you're living a healthy lifestyle overall.
We should be clear and distinguish deodorants in general from antiperspirants specifically. Aluminum compounds are the only known effective antiperspirants, you can ask for an aluminum-free antiperspirant but you'll get a product that doesn't work very well (if at all). However, there are many options for aluminum-free deodorants that aren't antiperspirants.
I thought it was well known that antiperspirants should be avoided because of the aluminum.
[+] [-] nilved|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gwern|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jxramos|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] iandanforth|8 years ago|reply
- A journal name I don't recognize
- A single author from an institution that I don't recognize
- Use of absolute terminology 'unquestionably'
- Implied vague relationships between large biological systems 'sweating' reduces chances of Alzheimer.
[+] [-] Florin_Andrei|8 years ago|reply
Well, either that, or I got too much aluminum in my brain and I'm confused. :)
[+] [-] stoshe|8 years ago|reply
http://i.imgur.com/FlCnduG.png
[+] [-] alakin|8 years ago|reply
Interestingly the only differences between Apoe4 and a neutral, very common variant called ApoE3 is one amino acid at position 112. The small variance appears to account for most of the negative effect of the ApoE4 genotype. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28533891
[+] [-] pmontra|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kbenson|8 years ago|reply
Edit: Removed question about exposure, since it was answered in parent.
[+] [-] CiPHPerCoder|8 years ago|reply
Can't have Alzheimer's without Al.
EDIT: Oh come on HN, periodic table jokes are in right now.
[+] [-] strangattractor|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] michaelmu|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gjem97|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Xeoncross|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] NikolaeVarius|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] HarryHirsch|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] opportune|8 years ago|reply
Overall I'd say this is a pretty garbage article and that we shouldn't be upvoting it so much / only reading the headline and accepting it as fact.
[+] [-] ef4|8 years ago|reply
Please remember to be be skeptical of links like this. Being in "a journal" is not a high bar.
[+] [-] rrggrr|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] CountSessine|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] reubenmorais|8 years ago|reply
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691500...
[+] [-] ianai|8 years ago|reply
Google edit- it definitely can leach.
[+] [-] mywittyname|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] danielhooper|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sevensor|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] spoiledtechie|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hammock|8 years ago|reply
[1]https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/phs/phs.asp?id=1076&tid=34
[+] [-] mccada|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] aeriklawson|8 years ago|reply
Diet and exercise, folks. I wouldn't worry about the aluminum in your deodorant - make sure you're living a healthy lifestyle overall.
[+] [-] euroclydon|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] moo360|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] njx|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] derrickgrant|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] klodolph|8 years ago|reply
I thought it was well known that antiperspirants should be avoided because of the aluminum.
[+] [-] halite|8 years ago|reply
I have used these and are not bad. See if you can get these in the UK.
[+] [-] hammock|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|8 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] 2_listerine_pls|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mygo|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] notadoc|8 years ago|reply
I recently read about a relationship between alzheimers and pesticides.
https://www.nature.com/articles/srep32222
There is obviously much more to learn.
[+] [-] franciscop|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] blue1|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] prodikl|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pc86|8 years ago|reply