Somebody took 'undefined behavior means that your compiler may optimize out large swathes of code in favor of execve("/usr/games/nethack"); way too seriously" :-)
I was going to protest the full Lena image without a NSFW warning, but hadn't realised the full story of its history[1]...
The site in general is a beautiful work of art, a great blend of attention to detail with comedy of computing in that era.
[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenna - tl;dr is this iconic test picture for computer imaging was a cropped Playboy centerfold from 1972. I've just finished a PhD which included a fair bit of image processing, but I was unaware of the story behind this iconic image.
You were going to protest it? And do you think anyone would care about your protest? Do you really expect everyone else to annotate the entire internet on your behalf? Despite the fact that this is a totally random, joke website that is almost certainly not work related?
What about people in countries or workplaces where "unacceptable" is a far broader and more oppressive net than "contains nudity", or places where nudity is fine? For whom do we annotate the internet? Maybe you should just disable auto-load of images in your browser or install a nudity filter.
The part that impressed me the most is you can drag and drop files from your own desktop onto this. It even opens those files in it's own editors when you double click the icon.
This is a work of art. The ProgressQuest game loading screen is one of the funniest things I've seen in a while. Like all well-told jokes, it's in the timing.
ProgressQuest[1] was an actual "game" many years ago. It was kind of the progenitor of the current incremental/idle games. Looks like its basically the whole thing compiled to this ui.
Sort of :) Explore the "c drive" to learn about the libs. I couldn't find an uncompressed version of the main code, but in the Chrome devtools most scripts are uncompresed.
Accidental "works best in browser X" 90s reference right there.
I find Safari superior to every other browser on any platform in every possible metric except for dev tools, which took a nose dive when they ditched the open source WebKit one for this calamity.
The joke isn't "works best in IE" the joke is "Safari is the default browser that ships with the OS, few people get a better browser, and even though it's a piece of shit you have to continue supporting it."
>I find Safari superior to every other browser on any platform in every possible metric except for dev tools
I could remove nearly 15% of my CSS if I stopped supporting Safari at work and I wouldn't need a hundred different quirky workarounds to make the sites look even remotely how they're supposed to look. It fights me every inch of the way and then has some of the worst dev tools for debugging where any issues are.
I'd rather support IE8 for eternity if it means I never have to write another `@media screen and (min-color-index:0) and(-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio:0) {}` in my CSS again.
Those using IE6 also thought it was the best for a long time. Only because developers adhered to it's quirks, though, so stuff worked there (and not in "better browsers"). In the same way people accommodate Safari today, otherwise you would have felt left out a long time ago.
> /c/files/documents/private/SUPER TOP PRIVATE/THIS IS PRIVATE STOP/WHAT ARE YOU DOING/WHAT STOP PLEASE/I DID NOT GIVE YOU PERMISSION/PRIVATE GET THE HELL OUT/YOUR HURTING ME STOP/HOW HAVE I WRONGED YOU/I WILL PUNCH YOU IN THE FACE/PLEASE STOP ITS PRIVATE/I HATE YOU/
[+] [-] ninjakeyboard|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] omk|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] make3|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] delinka|8 years ago|reply
Note: units intentionally left blank
[+] [-] nickpsecurity|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] meerita|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] vxxzy|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pgeorgi|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] zumatic|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nom|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jordache|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] vocatus_gate|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lordofire|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] graeham|8 years ago|reply
The site in general is a beautiful work of art, a great blend of attention to detail with comedy of computing in that era.
[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenna - tl;dr is this iconic test picture for computer imaging was a cropped Playboy centerfold from 1972. I've just finished a PhD which included a fair bit of image processing, but I was unaware of the story behind this iconic image.
[+] [-] PostOnce|8 years ago|reply
What about people in countries or workplaces where "unacceptable" is a far broader and more oppressive net than "contains nudity", or places where nudity is fine? For whom do we annotate the internet? Maybe you should just disable auto-load of images in your browser or install a nudity filter.
This is insane.
[+] [-] laumars|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] marxdeveloper|8 years ago|reply
Title: RPG MO
(Don't leave a space before iframe in the command)
[+] [-] krrrh|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] scrame|8 years ago|reply
[1] http://progressquest.com/
[+] [-] Jach|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] behnamoh|8 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] shimon_e|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] JulianWasTaken|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ahacker15|8 years ago|reply
Is this open source? So we could see how it was made?
[+] [-] kowdermeister|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] blntechie|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] msq|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] flavio81|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tambourine_man|8 years ago|reply
Accidental "works best in browser X" 90s reference right there.
I find Safari superior to every other browser on any platform in every possible metric except for dev tools, which took a nose dive when they ditched the open source WebKit one for this calamity.
[+] [-] Nadya|8 years ago|reply
>I find Safari superior to every other browser on any platform in every possible metric except for dev tools
I could remove nearly 15% of my CSS if I stopped supporting Safari at work and I wouldn't need a hundred different quirky workarounds to make the sites look even remotely how they're supposed to look. It fights me every inch of the way and then has some of the worst dev tools for debugging where any issues are.
I'd rather support IE8 for eternity if it means I never have to write another `@media screen and (min-color-index:0) and(-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio:0) {}` in my CSS again.
[+] [-] maaaats|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jrimbault|8 years ago|reply
I can't really disagree with you, but Safari is exclusive to macOS...
[+] [-] TeMPOraL|8 years ago|reply
- Half Life 3
- Defrag <3.
- Running Windows93 inside Windows93 inside Windows93 inside Windows93...
A work of art, indeed. Kudos!
[+] [-] elipsey|8 years ago|reply
now it's crashed and won't reload.
is there a work around for my workflow?
[+] [-] abluecloud|8 years ago|reply
fair enough.
[+] [-] strin|8 years ago|reply
Then I realized everything is written with web technology.
[+] [-] josteink|8 years ago|reply
That would be very impressive, considering that Windows 93 never existed.
[+] [-] runnr_az|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] koyote|8 years ago|reply
It's also quite buggy (chrome/linux) which adds to the whole Windows 9x feeling. Not sure if intentional but well done anyhow!
[+] [-] gerdesj|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] joecool1029|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] std_throwaway|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Drakim|8 years ago|reply
Uncheck that box and you'll have a chance :D
[+] [-] gallerdude|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Paul_S|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] NTripleOne|8 years ago|reply