TLDR; For legacy reasons, some words produce valid colors even if they don't respect the standard color formats. For example, "chucknorris" produces red.
Someone should make a list of all words and common phrases that result in a color different from #000000 and then go through them all and pick out the interesting ones.
By the way I didn't see any mention of max length. Is there a limitiation to the length of the color string?
Bonus question: What color would the complete works of Shakespeare be? Take all of his scene play manuscripts found on Project Gutenberg but excluding duplicates if any, sort them in the order they were originally published and concatenate into a single string.
Got to admit I was hoping it'd be a coffee-ish colour before I sorta parsed the colour in my head and realised it was mostly green.
With that said there are some pretty cool ones (e.g. 5afe57 = safest = a green) that do match up. Can't say I can think of many hugely practical uses for this, but it's kinda neat!
SAFEST is a decent green and ACIDIC is a decent red -- probably going to use these instead of #f00 and #0f0 next time I need success/failure color codes for some hastily-made web thing.
The idea is nice, but (as a suggestion) I would add a drop down to "strict" where you can tick whether to include 0 (zero) and 1 (one) as respectively O and I, which is what everyone would likely read as well as - maybe - 5=S while the 1 as L (as in 1337) and the 7=T are far less intuitive.
To give anyone freedom of choice maybe adding a "selectively strict" button with ticks for each leet letter would be ideal (as an example I cannot read the 2 as R as it is used on http://bada55.io/ ).
One oddity: for some reason, the site's CSS makes text selection highlights invisible. If you select text, the selection looks identical to unselected text, though copy/paste still works.
Also, the color boxes appear to be editable text areas: if you click on one, you can backspace or Ctrl-U and the text of the color vanishes, until you hover/unhover it again and the text gets reset (because of the 1337/LEET translation going on with hover/unhover).
They seem to have intentionally done this, by setting ::selection to transparent. I don't understand why some people think this is a good ideal, for colorblind people this is a real nuisance.
That likely has less to do with strictness of number/letter substitutions and more to do with "tac" not appearing in the dictionary (unlike "tic" and "toe").
Nice - I built something similar a few years ago, mostly to mess around with CSS columns (http://thejacklawson.com/csswords/). I only used a regex over the system dictionary, so it doesn't include a lot of what it probably could.
[+] [-] vmarquet|8 years ago|reply
TLDR; For legacy reasons, some words produce valid colors even if they don't respect the standard color formats. For example, "chucknorris" produces red.
[+] [-] eriknstr|8 years ago|reply
By the way I didn't see any mention of max length. Is there a limitiation to the length of the color string?
Bonus question: What color would the complete works of Shakespeare be? Take all of his scene play manuscripts found on Project Gutenberg but excluding duplicates if any, sort them in the order they were originally published and concatenate into a single string.
[+] [-] lol768|8 years ago|reply
With that said there are some pretty cool ones (e.g. 5afe57 = safest = a green) that do match up. Can't say I can think of many hugely practical uses for this, but it's kinda neat!
[+] [-] myth_buster|8 years ago|reply
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffee_roasting#Roasts
[+] [-] asmosoinio|8 years ago|reply
Though with the numbers in the beginning it's not as readable as e.g. BADA55.
[+] [-] nsomaru|8 years ago|reply
How do you do that?
[+] [-] zakk|8 years ago|reply
#ACE71C is quite acetic, on the other hand.
[+] [-] kngl|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] deepakb358|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] vacri|8 years ago|reply
Unfortunately 'secede' is blue rather than gray...
[+] [-] nailer|8 years ago|reply
#F0E71D
is the colour of asafoetida: https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=asafoetida&source=lnms&tbm...
And #C0C0A5 is cocoa.
For fitness studio folks who are into hex (of which there are obviously billions) #F17 (bright pink) would be popular too.
[+] [-] alikoneko|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hinkley|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] atemerev|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] victormustar|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|8 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] tkyjonathan|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] thebouv|8 years ago|reply
http://bada55.io/
[+] [-] semi-extrinsic|8 years ago|reply
https://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2014/06/19/rebeccapurple/
[+] [-] pilaf|8 years ago|reply
That's really stretching it.
[+] [-] styfle|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|8 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] hayleox|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] madeofpalk|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] turkeywelder|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] K2L8M11N2|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mrspeaker|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] wingerlang|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] madcaptenor|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pavement|8 years ago|reply
Bonus points: named color support for valid CSS colors, such as dodgerblue.
[+] [-] chrisbennet|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] forgot-my-pw|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jaclaz|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] adolph|8 years ago|reply
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiesta_(dinnerware)
[+] [-] Etheryte|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] TrickyRick|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mxfh|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rpastuszak|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] boozelclark|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] JoshTriplett|8 years ago|reply
One oddity: for some reason, the site's CSS makes text selection highlights invisible. If you select text, the selection looks identical to unselected text, though copy/paste still works.
Also, the color boxes appear to be editable text areas: if you click on one, you can backspace or Ctrl-U and the text of the color vanishes, until you hover/unhover it again and the text gets reset (because of the 1337/LEET translation going on with hover/unhover).
[+] [-] vegardx|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] merraksh|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] JoshTriplett|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ajacksified|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] waynecochran|8 years ago|reply