top | item 14613441 (no title) nebucnaut | 8 years ago Yes, dynamically typed languages are much harder to tackle :/ discuss order hn newest dkarapetyan|8 years ago You don't need it to be fully automated. For dynamic languages you would have people in the loop to annotate the parts the tool couldn't figure out. nautilus12|8 years ago This seems like no better off. Documentation is historically always out of date the second its written. The same would be true for annotation. load replies (2) lallysingh|8 years ago You're best off getting traces from a modified runtime to annotate what's going on.
dkarapetyan|8 years ago You don't need it to be fully automated. For dynamic languages you would have people in the loop to annotate the parts the tool couldn't figure out. nautilus12|8 years ago This seems like no better off. Documentation is historically always out of date the second its written. The same would be true for annotation. load replies (2) lallysingh|8 years ago You're best off getting traces from a modified runtime to annotate what's going on.
nautilus12|8 years ago This seems like no better off. Documentation is historically always out of date the second its written. The same would be true for annotation. load replies (2)
lallysingh|8 years ago You're best off getting traces from a modified runtime to annotate what's going on.
dkarapetyan|8 years ago
nautilus12|8 years ago
lallysingh|8 years ago