top | item 14840888 (no title) bykovich2 | 8 years ago That's the point, dude. discuss order hn newest kittiepryde|8 years ago The point seemed to me, they were saying that selling a kid to pay for the others was equivalent to not being legally married. bykovich2|8 years ago I believe the point was that selling a kid to pay for the others is a suggestion similarly (if not identically) indifferent to emotional realities as suggesting that a committedly-married couple get a divorce to change their tax status. load replies (1)
kittiepryde|8 years ago The point seemed to me, they were saying that selling a kid to pay for the others was equivalent to not being legally married. bykovich2|8 years ago I believe the point was that selling a kid to pay for the others is a suggestion similarly (if not identically) indifferent to emotional realities as suggesting that a committedly-married couple get a divorce to change their tax status. load replies (1)
bykovich2|8 years ago I believe the point was that selling a kid to pay for the others is a suggestion similarly (if not identically) indifferent to emotional realities as suggesting that a committedly-married couple get a divorce to change their tax status. load replies (1)
kittiepryde|8 years ago
bykovich2|8 years ago