People are worried about the wrong bees. Hundreds of native bee species are in decline - possibly due to pesticides and loss of habitat. An enormous number of plants - including many crops - are dependent on native bees for pollination.
Nobody mentions this reason to love bees: they make excellent inspiration. I have a big deadline coming up and just moved my desk to face the garden. Watching the bumble bees nosing around the lavender patch is keeping me more industrious than the carrot/stick!
Mites have been the largest issue and will likely take decades for the genetics to select out for an uneasy balance. In the mean time, the commercial guys can't keep doing business as usual and have to cleanup their act - they had a nice free ride for a while
The article makes it sound like it's not clear that is the issue. By the end it makes it sound like they really want to say it's pesticides, but the farming industry relies on that so much for "good looking" food that perhaps beekeepers are worried that if they point at that, farmers will be angry with them.
EDIT: to be clear, I'm talking about what was written in this article. I know nothing about the past mite issues in feral bee populations. Not debating that.
> "…the overall increase is largely the result of constant replenishment of losses, the study showed."
Very misleading headline. The bees are not bouncing back, humans are splitting up stronger hives into weaker hives. Kinda like saying humankind is beating cancer by having more babies in third-world countries.
As other have noted, splitting is a natural process of beekeeping.
however, I've noticed a discernible change in the beekeeping profession in the last 10 years.
To take a step back - there is a huge variation in bee characteristics from hive to hive.
What I've noticed is that package and nuc suppliers (aka bee breeders) are far less likely to treat hives. And it has become near impossible to buy 'traditional' chemical bee disease medications.
The prevailing modus operandi these days is to leverage natural evolutionary processes. I.e. let weak hive fail and therefor let undesirable genes phase out.
Hive splitting is quite a natural process. New "weak" hives quickly become "strong" hives. A single queen bee can lay hundreds and even thousands of eggs per day. During late spring, hive population doubles every few weeks.
Ahh, I don't think so. The _rate_ of CCD has decreased since last year. If we were "splitting up stronger hives into weaker hives", shouldn't CCD have stayed the same or increased?
> The number of hives lost to Colony Collapse Disorder, a phenomenon of disappearing bees that has raised concerns among farmers and scientists for a decade, was 84,430 in this year’s first quarter, down 27 percent from a year earlier. Year-over-year losses declined by the same percentage in April through June, the most recent data in the survey.
//edit: but idk, maybe I'm confused here too. At the very least, we've figured out a way to breed bees quickly so that we can outpace CCD?
> humans are splitting up stronger hives into weaker hives
That's not really an accurate way of describing beekeeping procedure. Yes hives are split, but that's how hives reproduce in nature. "Weaker" hives just start smaller and grow.
Not that CCD isn't worth looking into, but it's not like the average hive comes out weaker.
Totally agree with you that the title is misleading. Commercial bee hive number increased by 3% year on year, but there is still a lot of CCD.
So it's not clear if "Bees are bouncing back" or if beekeepers are getting better at preserving them or if USA just had a nicer weather.
Whatever decrease in losses they have from the disorder, my puppy is making up for by eating them. Or at least it seems like it. I have to make sure he doesn't get near any when I take him on walks and he still manages to get a couple here and there usually. I can't believe he hasn't been stung enough to stop going after them by now.
[+] [-] Noumenon72|8 years ago|reply
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/05/where-have-all-insect...
[+] [-] rpenm|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] vanattab|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] chaoticmass|8 years ago|reply
Though as I say that, I think about last time I went thru that state I didn't have as many bugs as I remember in the past....
[+] [-] mbgerring|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jansho|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lostlogin|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pmurT|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bluejekyll|8 years ago|reply
EDIT: to be clear, I'm talking about what was written in this article. I know nothing about the past mite issues in feral bee populations. Not debating that.
[+] [-] Dowwie|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kneath|8 years ago|reply
Very misleading headline. The bees are not bouncing back, humans are splitting up stronger hives into weaker hives. Kinda like saying humankind is beating cancer by having more babies in third-world countries.
[+] [-] radiorental|8 years ago|reply
As other have noted, splitting is a natural process of beekeeping.
however, I've noticed a discernible change in the beekeeping profession in the last 10 years.
To take a step back - there is a huge variation in bee characteristics from hive to hive.
What I've noticed is that package and nuc suppliers (aka bee breeders) are far less likely to treat hives. And it has become near impossible to buy 'traditional' chemical bee disease medications.
The prevailing modus operandi these days is to leverage natural evolutionary processes. I.e. let weak hive fail and therefor let undesirable genes phase out.
[+] [-] _rpd|8 years ago|reply
You can read a brief overview here ... http://americanbeejournal.com/beekeeping-by-the-numbers-2/
[+] [-] civilian|8 years ago|reply
> The number of hives lost to Colony Collapse Disorder, a phenomenon of disappearing bees that has raised concerns among farmers and scientists for a decade, was 84,430 in this year’s first quarter, down 27 percent from a year earlier. Year-over-year losses declined by the same percentage in April through June, the most recent data in the survey.
//edit: but idk, maybe I'm confused here too. At the very least, we've figured out a way to breed bees quickly so that we can outpace CCD?
[+] [-] tptacek|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bpodgursky|8 years ago|reply
That's not really an accurate way of describing beekeeping procedure. Yes hives are split, but that's how hives reproduce in nature. "Weaker" hives just start smaller and grow.
Not that CCD isn't worth looking into, but it's not like the average hive comes out weaker.
[+] [-] gwenzek|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cableshaft|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] DrScump|8 years ago|reply
[0] http://www.sciencemag.org/news/sifter/philosophy-journal-cor...
[+] [-] zeofig|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mr-ron|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] macintux|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] honestoHeminway|8 years ago|reply
Or mites that only live from mites.
[+] [-] digitalzombie|8 years ago|reply
I can have a cancer survival rate of 15% and get a 2% bounce back with 17% doesn't mean everything is swell.
[+] [-] ohiovr|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] EGreg|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lostlogin|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] donatj|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] BucketSort|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] debt|8 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] vlunkr|8 years ago|reply
[deleted]