top | item 14968588 (no title) mahmud | 8 years ago No, they both got it from Common Lisp (ca 1984) discuss order hn newest xenophonf|8 years ago Is that a Common Lisp thing or something that predates the ANSI standard? SBCL doesn't like that syntax: * 10_000 debugger invoked on a UNBOUND-VARIABLE: The variable |10_000| is unbound. According to the Common Lisp HyperSpec, "_" is an alphabetic constituent character:http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/02_ad....http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/02_adb... kazinator|8 years ago Rather, perhaps, Ada 83.
xenophonf|8 years ago Is that a Common Lisp thing or something that predates the ANSI standard? SBCL doesn't like that syntax: * 10_000 debugger invoked on a UNBOUND-VARIABLE: The variable |10_000| is unbound. According to the Common Lisp HyperSpec, "_" is an alphabetic constituent character:http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/02_ad....http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/02_adb...
xenophonf|8 years ago
http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/02_ad....
http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/02_adb...
kazinator|8 years ago