top | item 15057233

Diaspora version 0.7.0.0 released

128 points| chtfn | 8 years ago |blog.diasporafoundation.org | reply

62 comments

order
[+] jancsika|8 years ago|reply
Someone should run a Diaspora pod with the following model:

1. They market it like crazy in the hopes of getting something like a few million users

2. They publicly state that they will mine all metadata for the purpose of generating an "inference report".

3. Every other week they release an "inference report" that reveals a new, dangerous way the seemingly innocuous metadata can be used. Some examples would include a) accurately gleaning more private data from the metadata, and-- if enough people join-- b) using that data to subtly influence the behavior of the participants.

Outside researchers are given access to the process in order to audit it. Anything revealed in the inference report would be assumed to already be happening on larger commercial networks.

Users would remain as long as they believe the value of the inference reports outweigh the risk to them of using the network.

Edit: formatting

[+] Animats|8 years ago|reply
1. They market it like crazy in the hopes of getting something like a few million users.

That's the problem. Nobody uses Disapora*.

I got an account a few years ago, but abandoned it after discovering there was nobody on there worth talking to.

[+] quickben|8 years ago|reply
The idea sounds like Matadors day job.

Everybody want to see the results, rarely who will want to actually be there.

How do you incentivise it?

[+] tw1010|8 years ago|reply
I like these guys' perseverance. But part of me can't stop the feeling of sadness that they've spent a better part of a decade working on it, perhaps the best years of their lives. I know perseverance and failure is seen as good things in certain circles, but I don't think I've ever read a biography where the author spent ten years on something that ultimately went nowhere and then went on to do things of enough noteworthiness to merit said biography.
[+] michaelchisari|8 years ago|reply
I spent 8 years working on Appleseed (also a federated social network, 2003 to approx. 2011) and it was worth every minute, even though it never went anywhere. Working on a problem that nobody has been able to solve gives you really good insight into software engineering that you can't get when you're implementing other people's solutions, no matter how complex those solutions are.

Even though I failed, I benefited quite a bit by taking on something so ambitious, and whether Diaspora succeeds or fails, the people working on it will most like be able to say the same.

[+] xkarga00|8 years ago|reply
> I don't think I've ever read a biography where the author spent ten years on something that ultimately went nowhere and then went on to do things of enough noteworthiness to merit said biography.

Didn't it occur to you that even if diaspora goes nowhere, the work these guys have been doing may be influential or even the foundation for something that will actually go somewhere in the future?

[+] spodek|8 years ago|reply
Nelson Mandela spent 27 years in jail before becoming president and father of a nation.

While "only" 4 years, Muhammad Ali sacrificed what would have been the prime of his boxing career as a conscientious objector. He was famous as a great athlete before, but transcended it after.

Alexander Calder was an engineer for about ten years before becoming one of the great artists of the 20th century.

Many other examples.

[+] avaer|8 years ago|reply
That you don't hear about the ten years of failure before the success says more about what sells biographies than it says about the founders.
[+] ajmurmann|8 years ago|reply
As far as I can tell from the commit log it's a quite different group of people who are maintaining this now as an open source project than the four people who launched it from the Kickstarter 7 years ago.
[+] Turing_Machine|8 years ago|reply
"Ten Year Overnight Success" is almost a cliche in the music world, and of course most musicians (even very talented ones) never hit it big at all.
[+] blubb-fish|8 years ago|reply
so, my life goal should be to spend my time such that you (or anybody else) would be willing to read my biography?
[+] pvg|8 years ago|reply
You should read some Newton bios.
[+] alchemism|8 years ago|reply
Abraham Lincoln, albeit not a scientist.
[+] mejin|8 years ago|reply
While I completely support the goal of diaspora, I don't think that I can use it. one of the main benefits of Facebook is that I can look up someone's information / posts without them being informed. Imo that is what made Facebook so big in the first place.
[+] gaius|8 years ago|reply
Zuck et al probably realised very early on that casual stalking was a major use case. Not in a dangerous way, but maybe you wanted to find out a little more about that guy or girl before you asked them out, that sort of thing. They were all in college at the time after all. So he was careful not to include any feature that would inhibit this.
[+] sp332|8 years ago|reply
This is my biggest pet peeve about Facebook. I'd pay money for better analytics about my posts.
[+] dewey|8 years ago|reply
Is there a bigger community actually using Diaspora? Maybe I'm outside of that bubble that's why I'm wondering.
[+] dredmorbius|8 years ago|reply
I'm only peripherally attached (I've got a ... long-dormant Diaspora account), but there are a number of semi-inter-related open-social projects, which talk to various extents. "The Fediverse" includes a few of those, and I think it has bridges/gateways to Diaspora.

Frendica is another, I think, related protocol.

The problem generally is that the communities are small, diversified, hosting is a hurdle for virtually anyone, and individual instances can be finicky.

(On Mastodon -- a different technology entirely, but similar in concept -- I have two accounts on different instances, and since April have found that one or the other has been down, unavailable, or technically unusable for up to weeks at a time.)

Should some nucleating group decide that they were going all-in on Diasapora (or a compatible tech), that might make a difference. Meantime, everything seems stuck in slow-start mode.

[+] dredmorbius|8 years ago|reply
Wikipedia gives 677,000 as the size of the Diaspora community

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diaspora_(social_network) citing The Federation: https://the-federation.info

That's ... on the order of Usenet ~1990 or so, per personal conversations with Gene Spafford a few years back. Where "OTO" could be 500k - 5m users. Much of Usenet was far smaller.

Microsoft did some studies on Usenet nodes and behavioural patterns in the early 2000s, and got some usage numbers out of that, though I'd have to dig to find them again.

[+] 482794793792894|8 years ago|reply
It's not an overwhelming lot, so I wouldn't expect you to find someone on there that you already know, but it has this sort of early internet forum charm, where you can easily get to know a handful of strangers and hop on there every now and then to talk to those.

Also, its community does very much consist out of the more technical crowd, with a focus on privacy and it also helps if you don't mind the occasional free software activist shouting about. That's just the group that's most likely to sign up to it, which can be a blessing as even with so few people, you always find someone to talk about tech stuff, but it can at times also get somewhat old...

[+] adnam|8 years ago|reply
I think it would be really interesting to build something like dispora as a suite of dockerised micro-services which would allow you to add and extend functionality based on a new social-networkong protocol in a language-agnostic way. It would also be very easy to incorporate email and xmpp which are already federated protocols.
[+] Brakenshire|8 years ago|reply
Docker should help in general with making services like this more accessible. I can imagine someone like Fastmail using docker to allow a one click process to set up a Diaspora or Mastodon node. That should take the hassle out of it, and if you could just watch a 3 min video to explain the concept/metaphors, and set it up in 30 seconds, it expands the possible audience from system admins and software engineers, up to anyone technically inclined.
[+] dgudkov|8 years ago|reply
I don't know if these guys have funding or not, but they deserve it. There is too much centralization nowadays. Too many eggs in the same basket.
[+] amelius|8 years ago|reply
Yes, too much centralization going on.

But ... isn't Diaspora trying to solve a too big problem? Ideally, shouldn't the decentralization-space be filled by smaller services? For example, in my perfect world, instant messaging and newsfeeds would be two separate projects. That way, not only is the information decentralized, but also the development of the decentralized web becomes more decentralized (in a way).

[+] dreamfactored|8 years ago|reply
I think Github could create a good nucleating community for federated networking. They could host a giant pod of Github users (could be the next venue following slashdot>kuro5hin>reddit>hn), and they could also create 1 click tooling for Github users to create pod for their own project communities.

Would be a good kickstarter for generating sufficient network effect value to use in the first place, evolving the platform software through real world tire kicking, and getting it out to the wider world. And being github, as well as a sufficiently technical userbase, there's already a business model around freemium hosting which could be applied.

[+] blubb-fish|8 years ago|reply
diaspora is flawed by design. it will only ever be used by techies b/c either you take care of your own server or you have to trust somebody with your data.

what is needed is a facebook e.V. with a strict data safety policy.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Registered_association_(Germ...

it would cost transparently what is needed to sustain the service.

[+] beagle3|8 years ago|reply
That's not helpful. "data safety policy" is only as safe as you trust the people running it, and as long as you trust the government not to change the playing field.

Historically, neither of these tend to be sustainable.

[+] infinity0|8 years ago|reply
Your comment contradicts itself. A facebook e.V. with a strict data safety policy would be nothing more than another organisation running something similar to diaspora.
[+] xvilka|8 years ago|reply
MediaGoblin and OpenBazaar also fit their Fediverse.
[+] mike-cardwell|8 years ago|reply
Does event management exist yet? I.e, can my friends and I create events and invite people to them like you can on Facebook?

Also, ISTR from last time I played with it, there was no ability to create photo albums/collections. Does that exist now?

Without those two things I couldn't even begin to consider getting people to start using it.

[+] gaius|8 years ago|reply
Lack of integration with their calendar right from the off is why Google Plus flopped, I reckon.
[+] unixhero|8 years ago|reply
How about for messaging and updates
[+] im3w1l|8 years ago|reply
If I and my friends are on the same pod, and I get banned from it, can I still talk to them?
[+] flaburgan|8 years ago|reply
What do you mean by "get banned"? If you mean you violate the term of use and the podmin closed your account, you can create one on another pod and re-add your friends for sure.