The Chinese government would not allow WeChat to exist if this weren’t the case. They already have a difficult job managing Tencent, which is arguably China’s second in command after the Party.
You don’t get that big without some serious concessions.
I use WeChat every day, but I hesitate momentarily before writing anything negative about the Chinese Govt... just in case.
Indeed. They don't need to restrict speech or monitor much, when they've convinced people to censor themselves. If I lived in an area that was repressive, I'd probably make sure I never said anything bad about the government.
One of the things I like about my country is that I can call my government out when they make bad choices and I can even organize a protest to show my displeasure.
Company CEO Ted Livingston stated Kik's aspirations to become "the WeChat of the West" and said that attracting younger users was an important part of the company's strategy
It's very unlikely that the Chinese government can force Kik to share data through a minority investment from Tencent. Their power is limited to behind their great firewall.
I also find it inconceivable that Ted @ Kik would do this. Disclosure: I've known him for years
Some time ago, I wechat messaged a link to a domain I just registered. I had the Apache access log open by chance and could see that along with my friend visiting the link, there were numerous other devices accessing it. From the IP, I could tell they were mobile phones from the same city I was in and a big city nearby (in China).
Could be interesting to make a more "controlled experiment".
The police HAS direct access. The group chats in particular are monitored. One recent story is that a man criticized police for, doing random alcohol tests on car drivers. Got arrested along with the group chat admin
Wonder how their surveillance infrastructure works. Do they duplicate all data and pipe it into some government datacenter? Or do they have some surveillance boxes installed on-site that just scan the data for certain keywords (like the NSA supposedly often did it)? Maybe the latter seems more likely since filtering the data first makes the overhead more manageable.
> Do they duplicate all data and pipe it into some government datacenter
All chat content in clear text, friend timelines, group chats, are piped into a gov't blackbox in datacenter.
There are dozens of cases when a guy complains about parking tickets in his private timeline then got detained for 3-7 days.
Recent hot buzz is a guy in private group chat joked about a new guy's bin laden avatar "are we gunna join ISIS" then got 9 months jail time[1] for "soliciting terrorism".
(On a side note, the tabloid, GlobalTimes once reported that whether ISIS is a terrorism organization is questionable.[2])
Is this surprising? I've known for a long time that WeChat chats and data could be read by the Chinese government, given that they censor the chats in real time and the close ties between Tencent and Beijing. I guess it's nice to be confirmed but it was already a given considering it's a Chinese company.
I've never used WeChat, that's interesting to me. How does the real-time censorship work exactly? If I attempt to discuss the Tiananmen Square massacre, would that chat message be instantly 'deleted' after sent (in however much time it takes for them to screen the message that is), something akin to that?
I had to install WeChat for work. What bothered me more was all the permissions it required to function. As I recall, it wanted access to my contacts, pictures, location. At each request, I tried saying no, and the app exited.
I assume the Chinese government got access to all my contacts, pictures, etc.
I really wish that apps were required to function in gracefully degraded modes when denied access to permissions they want. And I wish they had to explain each request.
Apparently the mainland China version of the app lets you continue using it without providing certain info; this is now in its privacy policy (technode translation):
"Unless it’s required by relevant laws, your objection in providing this information will block the feature concerned, but will not influence the usage of other features."
I'm glad we cleared the air on that. Now we can go back to using the service without all the stupid conspiracy theories that they do this. Surveillance is the norm in China. They do the same thing with IP from foreign firms [1].
Lenovo is a Chinese company. I'm typing this from a Thinkpad. Would it also be the norm for Lenovo to collect/share information from my laptop with the Chinese government?
Whaaaat? What a perspective. Are you... from China, perhaps? 🇨🇳 Privacy is a wonderful thing. I’m so glad it’s a value people still fight for in the West.
[+] [-] strayamaaate|8 years ago|reply
I use WeChat every day, but I hesitate momentarily before writing anything negative about the Chinese Govt... just in case.
I suppose they’ve done their job.
[+] [-] KGIII|8 years ago|reply
One of the things I like about my country is that I can call my government out when they make bad choices and I can even organize a protest to show my displeasure.
[+] [-] danmaz74|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] virtuabhi|8 years ago|reply
Tencent WeChat QQ 0/100. Hopeless.
[+] [-] redthrow|8 years ago|reply
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kik_Messenger
Company CEO Ted Livingston stated Kik's aspirations to become "the WeChat of the West" and said that attracting younger users was an important part of the company's strategy
[+] [-] Hongwei|8 years ago|reply
I also find it inconceivable that Ted @ Kik would do this. Disclosure: I've known him for years
[+] [-] mtgx|8 years ago|reply
http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/companies/wechat-c...
[+] [-] sctb|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mads|8 years ago|reply
Could be interesting to make a more "controlled experiment".
[+] [-] baybal2|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] EZ-E|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Asdfbla|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] est|8 years ago|reply
All chat content in clear text, friend timelines, group chats, are piped into a gov't blackbox in datacenter.
There are dozens of cases when a guy complains about parking tickets in his private timeline then got detained for 3-7 days.
Recent hot buzz is a guy in private group chat joked about a new guy's bin laden avatar "are we gunna join ISIS" then got 9 months jail time[1] for "soliciting terrorism".
(On a side note, the tabloid, GlobalTimes once reported that whether ISIS is a terrorism organization is questionable.[2])
[1]: http://news.163.com/17/0923/02/CV03O5BO00018AOP.html [2]: http://mil.huanqiu.com/observation/2014-09/5140363.html
[+] [-] pas|8 years ago|reply
WeChat simply skips the warrant checking and request scoping.
[+] [-] babesh|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] b3lvedere|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] yladiz|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] adventured|8 years ago|reply
I've never used WeChat, that's interesting to me. How does the real-time censorship work exactly? If I attempt to discuss the Tiananmen Square massacre, would that chat message be instantly 'deleted' after sent (in however much time it takes for them to screen the message that is), something akin to that?
[+] [-] eveningcoffee|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nathan_long|8 years ago|reply
I assume the Chinese government got access to all my contacts, pictures, etc.
I really wish that apps were required to function in gracefully degraded modes when denied access to permissions they want. And I wish they had to explain each request.
[+] [-] oefrha|8 years ago|reply
That's not true for the iOS version.
[+] [-] freakynit|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] redial|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] PopsiclePete|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] devindotcom|8 years ago|reply
http://technode.com/2017/09/19/now-its-official-wechat-is-wa...
Apparently the mainland China version of the app lets you continue using it without providing certain info; this is now in its privacy policy (technode translation):
"Unless it’s required by relevant laws, your objection in providing this information will block the feature concerned, but will not influence the usage of other features."
[+] [-] bitmapbrother|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] MarkMc|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pandem|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] virmundi|8 years ago|reply
1 - http://money.cnn.com/2017/08/14/news/economy/trump-china-tra...
[+] [-] colordrops|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] drusepth|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] narrator|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] benevol|8 years ago|reply
And in the US. And in Europe. And in Russia. And...
[+] [-] d0mine|8 years ago|reply
Holocaust denial is a conspiracy theory. Mass survilance is a fact of life.
[+] [-] nullnilvoid|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] linkmotif|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sandov|8 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] diefunction|8 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] jhugg|8 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] agumonkey|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] miguelrochefort|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] snakeanus|8 years ago|reply