No, it resolves uncertainty and lets the community move forward in a unified way. It also shows Bitcoin's resilience in the face of committed minorities who would try to take over its governance. In short, Bitcoin survived a coup d'état, achieving total victory over a rebellious group of powerful actors (CEOs mainly).
I checked coinbase expected exactly that, thinking "oh man, I'm glad I didn't sell my eth a month ago to buy into bc trying to capture free altcoins like others did and like I considered doing, it'll be down like 10% at least" but it... shot up about 10% instead. I don't get it.
Having too many forks makes it confusing for newcomers (and even hedge funds). So naturally avoiding a fork and keeping the community together is good for Bitcoin, which made the price go up.
Wouldn't you expect alts to do well in this situation, since it's essentially the yang to the yin of moving from alts into Bitcoin in fork anticipation?
byset|8 years ago
riffraff|8 years ago
could it not likewise be "it also shows Bitcoin is controlled by committed minorities which will not allow others to take over its governance" ?
From the outside, this seems the case.
ashark|8 years ago
RexetBlell|8 years ago
ratacat|8 years ago
bdcravens|8 years ago
temp987654|8 years ago
bdcravens|8 years ago
gruez|8 years ago
temp987654|8 years ago