top | item 15719817

(no title)

hasenj | 8 years ago

> a lot of Chrome's success came because they "made it work" in ways that Firefox (horribly wasteful of CPU, memory, battery life)

Uhh, do you have an ounce of self awareness?

Yes, it performed way better than Firefox, which is exactly my point.

discuss

order

zimpenfish|8 years ago

> Yes, it performed way better than Firefox, which is exactly my point.

No, you specifically called out the speed and speed only - "on the simple basis that it was _really fast_" - nothing about it working right in other areas (which are the ones that grabbed people, not the speed.)