Microservices in Java? Never

[erik_seaberg]

Fundamentally there's a set of facts you're going to need in memory while you're working on a request, and those data structures should have a similar footprint in any reasonable language. Java is only worse for people who have ignored NIO and are still making blocking calls from huge thread pools (I admit there are a lot of bad client libraries that are not async-first), or people whose workload is so tiny that they don't want to spend code space to gain speed (which the JIT tries hard to do).

Edit: and a deployment this strapped for cash should probably be hot-reloading the services within a single JVM rather than paying for lots of network marshalling across machine boundaries. Their platform has single instances 30x as powerful as they've chosen.

[wst_]

Blog author in comments: "Deploying a compiled binary allows you to specify incredibly low memory footprint containers whilst if I were to write a similar “Hello World” style of application in Java it would require at minimum 512MB of Memory in order to even start."

This must be some sort of provocation, because if it isn't... Takes my breath away.

[itronitron]

In Java's defense, it's the APIs (3rd party typically) and not the language that determine the performance criteria. It sure would be nice to hear what APIs they were using in Java for their monolithic application and microservices.

[forgotpassagan]

Python and Node use far more memory than Java. Golang uses less but not by orders of magnitude, maybe 3x less. Sounds like your JVM GC settings were off, Golang has GC just like Java.

Most Netflix and Google services are built in Java...

[megamindbrian2]

Ha https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...