Wars on poverty often become wars on poor people. I was there when Clinton reduced max coverage to 2 years. It was a sentence of lifetime poverty for people who had no option, and that was strongly enhanced by the "human glue".
I think the idea here is that cutting benefits could be construed as part of the War on Poverty by the argument that the benefits locked people into poverty.
gowld|8 years ago
ttonkytonk|8 years ago
DoreenMichele|8 years ago
Obvious answer: poor people.