That wasn't snarky because it was only mildly critical. Since it was mild, it also wasn't cutting. Lastly, it was not derogatory or mocking in an indirect way and so it was not snide either.
I disagree. Aside from the sarcastic "buffer overflow" comment, his comment was far more snide than any of the replies he seemed to be complaining about.
Since you take a different view though, as I asked in my post, if it's not "snarky" then what was it?
hungerstrike|8 years ago
LV-426|8 years ago
Despite the avalanche of downvotes burying my posts, not even one person can actually answer the question I asked:
The poster could have simply stopped typing after "Thank you for the explanation". He chose to unnecessarily add something more.
So, for everyone who disagrees with me: if what he said wasn't itself "snarky", what was it?
LV-426|8 years ago
Since you take a different view though, as I asked in my post, if it's not "snarky" then what was it?