[ArialAnemone]

>If software is eating the World, it's important the people building and operating it are as diverse as possible, otherwise there is a risk it unconsciously or consciously becomes biased in its actions and consequences towards a single social group at the expense of others.

Of course. We must have the most superficial diversity be promoted as necessary.

The fact that wealth is being more and more concentrated should be completely ignored. What's important is that we have x number of women and x number of racial category. It's not like money is the ultimate uniter of class interests that seek to divide and conquer with false ideological conflicts.

Why is your superficial diversity more important than not being beholden to the doublefaced moneyed who preach it and yet live in very undiverse neighborhoods where the majority of people are one race?

How is your diversity realistic when you benefit from vacuuming the entire world of intellectual human capital? You can't play the game of world bully forever.