Fire safety in wooden structures is interesting. A friend who does research in the area explained that, in some ways, wooden beams are simpler to engineer than steel beams when dealing with fire.
The goal, engineering wise, is to put a number on a given structure - how many hours can it burn before it falls?
A steel beam will maintain most of its strength up to the point it suddenly becomes soft and loses all of it. The exact point in time this occurs is hard to predict, because it varies substantially with several variables.
A wood beam will maintain the full strength of the beam, minus the average thickness of wood that is burned off per hour, which is a reasonably well known quantity.
This makes it simple (though not easy, of course!), relative to steel structures, to put a number on a wooden structure - "this building can burn for 2 hours before it is no longer safe for firemen to try to put it out from inside".
Very interesting! But there is quite literally zero cross-bracing in that structure, which leads me to believe this was designed by an architect and not a structural engineer.
Japan is unrivaled in building long-lasting wooden structures using only joinery (no nails, screws). This allows the wood to expand and contract harmoniously without cracking. Multi-story buildings (temples are a great example) have “floating” stories than may shift several feet during an earthquake, all kept together with a freestanding “spine” mounted only to the ground.
I don't remember the details, but on a previous article on wooden skyscapers, it was explained how the engineering of the wood, which is also required for the necessary structural strength, made it very dense and practically incombustible. Fire proofing is an inherent quality, not something that's applied and thus could be done poorly.
You might as well call it a steel tower at this point.
Steel is heavy but it's also very strong. You don't need a lot of it to build something. A pure steel building actually ends up being lighter than a concrete building because of this.
I have a certain dislike for wooden houses because a) they seem to have high maintenance requirements, since wood as an organic material is often attacked by fungi, mould, or insects b) the ones I've lived in were old buildings lacking insulation and draughty, thus freezing in winter. That could be fixed with insulation of course.
It's actually less about insulation and more about air sealing. A hermetically sealed home with no insulation is generally warmer than a leaky home with walls stuffed with insulation.
Also regarding wood, this isn't the kind of wood you're thinking of. It's called pressure treated lumber, and it's an order of magnitude stronger than normal wood. The lumber has preservatives injected specifically to prevent rot, insect damage, and fire resistance.
Regarding a), it very much depends on how they are built. Little Moreton Hall has been standing since 1504, subsequent restorations required no changes to the timber structure. Isn't it beautiful? Although I suspect it is definitely subject to point b)!
Bricks (everywhere, internal walls and all) and concrete (for the floors) are the best - no stupid squeaking, nothing to rot, nothing to break, great soundproofing, good thermal insulation if done right, will last a long time provided no natural disasters. Not even expensive depending on the region.
That said, I don't get the point of a wooden skyscraper. I'd guess it's earthquake resistant, and it's not actual natural wood but a mix of synthetic materials and wood.
[+] [-] jakewins|8 years ago|reply
The goal, engineering wise, is to put a number on a given structure - how many hours can it burn before it falls?
A steel beam will maintain most of its strength up to the point it suddenly becomes soft and loses all of it. The exact point in time this occurs is hard to predict, because it varies substantially with several variables.
A wood beam will maintain the full strength of the beam, minus the average thickness of wood that is burned off per hour, which is a reasonably well known quantity.
This makes it simple (though not easy, of course!), relative to steel structures, to put a number on a wooden structure - "this building can burn for 2 hours before it is no longer safe for firemen to try to put it out from inside".
[+] [-] tbabb|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] logicallee|8 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] unknown|8 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] unknown|8 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] tromp|8 years ago|reply
https://hautamsterdam.nl/en/
The name HAUT appears to be a play on the Dutch word for wood (HOUT) and the french word for tall (HAUTE).
[+] [-] mikeash|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] toomuchtodo|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] agumonkey|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] oever|8 years ago|reply
https://www.metsawood.com/global/Campaigns/planb/cases/woode...
[+] [-] swampthinker|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] steve19|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] KhanMahGretsch|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pimmen|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] armada651|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] prostoalex|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] baud147258|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] swampthinker|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] querulous|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] foobarbazetc|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] remontoire|8 years ago|reply
https://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/216369...
[+] [-] anonymous5133|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] m3kw9|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mseebach|8 years ago|reply
IIRC.
[+] [-] bparsons|8 years ago|reply
Even with steel, the actual frame of the building is surrounded by firewalls, fire resistant insulation and various suppression systems.
[+] [-] faragon|8 years ago|reply
Wood and steel.
[+] [-] imtringued|8 years ago|reply
Steel is heavy but it's also very strong. You don't need a lot of it to build something. A pure steel building actually ends up being lighter than a concrete building because of this.
[+] [-] unknown|8 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] incompatible|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] swampthinker|8 years ago|reply
Also regarding wood, this isn't the kind of wood you're thinking of. It's called pressure treated lumber, and it's an order of magnitude stronger than normal wood. The lumber has preservatives injected specifically to prevent rot, insect damage, and fire resistance.
[+] [-] alva|8 years ago|reply
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Moreton_Hall#/media/Fil...
[+] [-] jotm|8 years ago|reply
That said, I don't get the point of a wooden skyscraper. I'd guess it's earthquake resistant, and it's not actual natural wood but a mix of synthetic materials and wood.
[+] [-] emilfihlman|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] y123y|8 years ago|reply