If anyone was going to focus on making sure their self-driving car could drive in snow, it'd be the Russians.
Mind you, self-driving when snow has coated all your landmarks is definitely impressive, but the title made me think it'd be driving in snow. Which it isn't. The roads are, what we'd call in Chicago, "clear". The car is not driving in/on snow or ice in this scenario, which is something I do regularly every winter.
Canadian perspective: This is very clear. Much more challenging is something like a multi-lane highway where the road markings have completely disappeared under snow. I'll be impressed when it can drive from Hope into the BC interior in winter in conditions that a human driver can handle with winter tires and possibly studs, but no need for chains.
Rochester NY is probably the best place in the world for actual snow driving. Daily snowfall during the winter due to lake-effect snow. It's where I trained to drive a rear-wheel drive Camaro. Very useful place.
I'm sorry - this isn't a "heavy snowfall" in Moscow. It's just barely a dusting. That isn't even an inch of accumulation. Being able to self-drive when there is black pavement to be seen isn't impressive in the least. Show me a self-driving car functioning in white-out conditions (which is what Moscow faces on a regular basis, as does a large portion of the US) and I'll be impressed.
I also noticed that it was driving 25... I assumed that was 25 km/hr, which is pretty darned slow (15mph) even on snowy city streets. However, it could be that they're running the car in US mph instead?
I'd love for it to be true, but it's tough to believe that's real. There's one point where a pedestrian is standing in the snow on the road just to the side of where the car would pass:
https://youtu.be/Bx08yRsR9ow?t=35s
Wouldn't any pedestrian detection decide the person in the road has priority and stop and let them cross? It isn't capable of reading a person's intention to stand there vs. cross or not.
The title claims it supports interactions with pedestrians, and the video does seem to show it pausing in the middle of a turn once for a pedestrian in the road, but that could be easily faked by having the driver still using manual breaks.
That pedestrian is already in the street and they momentarily stutter then pass the pedestrian with very little room.
That and the way the steering seems super sensitive to various snow remainders on the side of the street. It's almost as if it's controlling for its position relative to the snow instead of picking a mostly straight trajectory.
From what I can tell it looks like the pedestrian’s vector is heading away from the car (right to left) for a few frames before he pauses. Couldn’t a level 5 model infer intentionality in a direction based on the way the pedestrian was walking?
People often forget that while Moscow is in Russia - this is not Syberia or something. We have a bit more snow than Berlin usually and a bit lower temperature.
So this video features a self-driving car developed by Yandex. Does someone have insight into why so many big tech companies seem to all be in agreement that developing self-driving cars is an area they need to be pursuing? Is it mostly everyone looking at what Google is doing and replicating that? Or is it the getting swept up by the Uber hype? Or is working on self-driving car software just such a natural extension to what these tech companies have been doing all along in their main areas of expertise anyway?
(I feel like this question must have been brought up a number of times already, since these projects have been going on for a while by now.)
technically correct title (the best kind!) - but clickbaity because everyone wants to see a serious test of self-driving on snow-covered, icy roads, ideally with actually blinding, falling snow - at night. This is, if anything, even easier than a non-snowy drive because of the high contrast between the completely clear road and the snow-dusted sidewalks.
The dream that the developers, the media, and many of us share is to change the world by making driving a thing people do not do. Matching a human driver in the most treacherous conditions is a major, and unmet milestone. This is a misleading post.
Have you ever seen someone driving in snow anywhere south of Pennsylvania in the US?
This tech, as-is, could probably save millions in damage on minor or one-car accidents in snowy aftermath. Even if it snows once or twice a year, somehow everyone forgets how to drive safely in the snow and Every.Single.Time there is snow the world just stops.
Unrelated to this video, I was impressed with my Subaru EyeSight performance in a whiteout rainstorm. I could tell what was going on - barely, with the wipers at full tilt - and my auto-cruise worked without a hitch at > 50MPH for several minutes straight. It's definitely hit-or-miss though, since sometimes it gets confused on a bright overcast day at 25MPH.
It moves at 17 seconds in, at 44 seconds in, 1 min 51 seconds in, etc. I'm guessing the driver was intentionally holding his hand there with effort, ready to grab control of the wheel if necessary.
I live in the neighborhood; these streets are all around Yandex headquarters. It's one of the best districts in the whole city, streets rigorously cleaned, very light traffic and surprisingly cultured drivers. Even after recent record-breaking snowfalls, these streets were very clear short after.
Would love to see them trying to drive anywhere else in the city though.
Wonder what's that thing at 1:40 ;) "at turn, wipers suddenly full tilt for no apparent reason, person gives input to the right paddle" - yes, I know that control normally sends CAN messages for wiper operation in all modern cars, and that it wouldn't make sense to release a video with overt manipulation of the system; I have been conditioned to look for side channels though, and this is technically a human giving a driving-related input.
But seriously, what does the car need the wipers for? All the sensors are outside anyway, no?
The wipers are needed for when a human needs to take control and if a human needs to suddenly take control they need to have the wipers already working recently.
The hardest human equivalent in New England in my youth, was a 4 way stop at the peak of a steep hill. Would have loved to seen this scenario with the self driving car.
[+] [-] ocdtrekkie|8 years ago|reply
Mind you, self-driving when snow has coated all your landmarks is definitely impressive, but the title made me think it'd be driving in snow. Which it isn't. The roads are, what we'd call in Chicago, "clear". The car is not driving in/on snow or ice in this scenario, which is something I do regularly every winter.
[+] [-] walrus01|8 years ago|reply
https://www.google.com/search?client=ubuntu&channel=fs&q=coq...
[+] [-] jpindar|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] emmelaich|8 years ago|reply
Which may make the auto driving easier.
[+] [-] mozumder|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] starpilot|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tw04|8 years ago|reply
This: http://bgr.com/2018/02/06/moscow-snow-russia-winter-storm/
Is what it looked like ~two weeks ago. Show me your self-driving car in THAT.
[+] [-] taylored|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] neutered_knot|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kurthr|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lnanek2|8 years ago|reply
Wouldn't any pedestrian detection decide the person in the road has priority and stop and let them cross? It isn't capable of reading a person's intention to stand there vs. cross or not.
The title claims it supports interactions with pedestrians, and the video does seem to show it pausing in the middle of a turn once for a pedestrian in the road, but that could be easily faked by having the driver still using manual breaks.
[+] [-] stefan_|8 years ago|reply
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bx08yRsR9ow&feature=youtu.be...
That pedestrian is already in the street and they momentarily stutter then pass the pedestrian with very little room.
That and the way the steering seems super sensitive to various snow remainders on the side of the street. It's almost as if it's controlling for its position relative to the snow instead of picking a mostly straight trajectory.
[+] [-] mrtksn|8 years ago|reply
If self-driving cars are to use the current infrastructure and drive as a regular car on regular roads then better be able to handle this.
[+] [-] EScott11|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] flyingfences|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ckdarby|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] avmich|8 years ago|reply
For snow-covered roads we'll have to wait for reports from, say, Chelyabinsk. Or Tomsk, or Novosibirsk...
[+] [-] konart|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] solomatov|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] seeekr|8 years ago|reply
(I feel like this question must have been brought up a number of times already, since these projects have been going on for a while by now.)
[+] [-] lokopodium|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] konart|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] vpribish|8 years ago|reply
The dream that the developers, the media, and many of us share is to change the world by making driving a thing people do not do. Matching a human driver in the most treacherous conditions is a major, and unmet milestone. This is a misleading post.
[+] [-] web007|8 years ago|reply
This tech, as-is, could probably save millions in damage on minor or one-car accidents in snowy aftermath. Even if it snows once or twice a year, somehow everyone forgets how to drive safely in the snow and Every.Single.Time there is snow the world just stops.
Unrelated to this video, I was impressed with my Subaru EyeSight performance in a whiteout rainstorm. I could tell what was going on - barely, with the wipers at full tilt - and my auto-cruise worked without a hitch at > 50MPH for several minutes straight. It's definitely hit-or-miss though, since sometimes it gets confused on a bright overcast day at 25MPH.
[+] [-] sthistrhn55|8 years ago|reply
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7hUut7Hsgys
[+] [-] bmer|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] adventured|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] golergka|8 years ago|reply
Would love to see them trying to drive anywhere else in the city though.
[+] [-] gaurx003|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] BugsJustFindMe|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Piskvorrr|8 years ago|reply
But seriously, what does the car need the wipers for? All the sensors are outside anyway, no?
[+] [-] undersuit|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tyingq|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] M_Bakhtiari|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nasredin|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pvaldes|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Tolika|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] thriftwy|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] EADGBE|8 years ago|reply
This isn’t as impressive as I was led to believe. Those roads are completely exposed!
[+] [-] mizzao|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] chemodax|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dmix|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] konart|8 years ago|reply
Only when you are outside of apartments' territory.
http://pddmaster.ru/pdd/pravila-dorozhnogo-dvizheniya-dlya-z...
[+] [-] timvisee|8 years ago|reply