top | item 16417811

(no title)

freshyill | 8 years ago

They compare it to hq4x in their supplementary materials. Theirs is better.

http://johanneskopf.de/publications/pixelart/supplementary/i...

discuss

order

lathiat|8 years ago

hq4x looks a lot better in the video comparison: http://johanneskopf.de/publications/pixelart/supplementary/v...

This method still wins out though.. but interesting never the less.

cooper12|8 years ago

I think hq4x has a slight edge because it doesn't go all the way trying to make everything smooth, still preserving some pixelation. There's actually an analog to this in denoising: if you denoise too heavily you end up losing detail. Smart denoising manages to preserve edges, giving a better result. In this case, pixels are the same as noise, undesirable, but containing useful information.