(no title)
char | 15 years ago
Arrington cites factors dealing with biological and societal tendencies of women as reasons for them to not engage in risky lifestyle choices such as startups, or to not be interested in tech in the first place. I agree with this. This isn't 'bad' or 'good', but it's the truth. People need to stop ignoring that there ARE (on average) differences between men and women. We (women) just aren't as interested in tech or building our own businesses in general.
I'm just one data point, but based on many experiences, I would strongly argue that in general, women do not have the desire to take as many risks as males, or deal with day-to-day uncertainties. A vast majority of my female friends thought I was absolutely nuts when I first started doing startups. (They still think I'm a little nutty, despite being able to pay my bills now). The most common questions were, "What are you going to do for money if it fails?" (Answer: Get a job, or build something else), and "How do you deal with not knowing what you're going to be doing in the next [insert some time period]?" On the other hand, my male friends overwhelmingly asked about the technologies I'm building and admired me for taking a risk. Also interesting to note is that the reaction of female friends to my (male) co-founder was more of admiration than thinking he was crazy (but I was looked upon as crazy).
On the other hand, for the women who ARE interested in tech (or could be persuaded to be interested), there are certainly existing challenges within the field itself. Again, I'm just one data point, but I am always amazed at the reactions I get from males in the startup world when they find out that I code. They are SHOCKED. Not only because I'm a woman, but also because I'm a white, blonde woman who is reasonably attractive. Sometimes I really do feel like I'm not taken seriously by many people until I do something completely bad ass to prove myself. The other article certainly has a point there.
Estragon|15 years ago
jobeirne|15 years ago
146|15 years ago
rradu|15 years ago
Alex3917|15 years ago
Considering that we live in an era where you can basically take a pill that gives you the experience of being a woman for whatever amount of time you want, it seems like these differences are going to get much harder to ignore, especially since this technology is only going to get better and more scientifically validated with time.
tbrownaw|15 years ago
Wait, what? I've never heard of that before, what is it?
oconnore|15 years ago
He is essentially asking males to ignore the current situation so that females can ignore the current situation (and the fact that women in tech are to some degree, still breaking new ground)
seldo|15 years ago
The reason you should ignore the current situation is precisely because _ignoring it will help change the situation_. That was the point of my post.
unknown|15 years ago
[deleted]
unknown|15 years ago
[deleted]
shareme|15 years ago
-Marriage -Getting Married to raise a family
Most of those have failure rates higher than starting a small business...and some would argue its approaching the risk level of startups.
Women on the whole are no more or less risk averse than Men.
electromagnetic|15 years ago
I work in construction, it's not high-risk but it's not office-job safe and we get higher pay than average and the company advertises to men and women. Our office has 4 female workers and 1 male (the owner), but we've only ever had 1 female employee outside the office and I believe she was the only one to ever apply and we have a fairly high turnover.
Why is our job not getting an equal number of applicants if women are just as risk taking as men because jobs are advertised to both.
adamesque|15 years ago
kgo|15 years ago
50% of small businesses will be gone in five years. 80% in ten. That's across the board, not just high-risk tech startups.