It's a question of fundamental incentives. Doctors and hospitals are paid for procedures, treatments, and appointments. Is it any surprise that there's incentive to undertake these activities? You don't even need to believe that your doctor is greedy to understand that if there's a borderline case, they might order the test or treatment "to be safe", or "because there's no downside", or because "we have the available capacity". Even if they aren't explicitly considering payment as part of the equation, it's not unreasonable to think that subconsciously the monetary incentive will tip some of these cases in the direction of overtreatment.IMO, the only way this is going to change is a movement away from the "pay for services" model that is dominant in US healthcare today.
novalis78|8 years ago
shawndimantha|8 years ago
lr4444lr|8 years ago
shimon|8 years ago
The complexity of these tradeoffs means that unusual choices are really hard to make well. This is most obvious in the expensive treatments that are sometimes applied before a patient's death -- expensive both in cost to deliver and harm to the patient's remaining days.