top | item 1659984

Scott Adams: Phone

74 points| cwan | 15 years ago |dilbert.com | reply

64 comments

order
[+] amirmc|15 years ago|reply
Side note:

> "When my so-called phone rings, my first reaction is "Shit. What's wrong now?" ..."

This is so true. Partly because we've trained our contacts this way. I only ring people when it's 'important' (read: shit+fan) and tend to expect the same in return.

It's odd since a 30 second phone call can usually replace 10 minutes of back and forth over email (albeit without the paper-trail).

[+] glhaynes|15 years ago|reply
I saw somebody not too long ago say something like "I wonder if 30 years from now, ringing someone on the phone will be considered as rude as we now consider showing up on their doorstep unannounced to be".
[+] Terry_B|15 years ago|reply
I have the same negative reaction to going to the mail box these days. With the exception of the odd expected delivery from amazon, nothing good comes from checking the mail.
[+] powrtoch|15 years ago|reply
Not that I don't like Scott Adams' blog, but every time I see (dilbert.com), I get my hopes up that just this once it'll be an actual comic.
[+] lincolnq|15 years ago|reply
Really? I'm quickly learning to expect it'll be an interesting blog post instead of a boring recycled-joke office comic.
[+] msg|15 years ago|reply
Whenever someone wonders in conversation who won the Battle of Trafalgar or how to get to Safeco Field by bus, I always say the same thing:

"That's the kind of question I ask the magic box."

For me this thing means knowledge. It's the oracle, the multitool, the utility belt, the mystic key.

I suggest we all call it "the box".

[+] auxbuss|15 years ago|reply
The box is already colloquial English for the TV, as in, "What's on the box tonight?".
[+] v21|15 years ago|reply
My friend calls it the "Everything Device".
[+] joelmichael|15 years ago|reply
Calling it a phone is fine. I don't see why the word can't evolve. These sort of things happen organically.

However, I liked his observation about the recipient of every phone call being a "victim."

[+] jobu|15 years ago|reply
I think we should call it a global communicator link, or "Global" for short.

Points to anyone who knows the reference.

[+] pkulak|15 years ago|reply
I was down until he got to what he wanted to call it. Really? Can we just choose something that isn't already tangled up in 50 pounds of sexual innuendo?
[+] daychilde|15 years ago|reply
Fifty pounds? You must have huge feet.

But on the topic at hand (as it were): I was hoping for some German-inspired mashup name, like "Device that allows one person to sometimes hear part of what another person is saying, no matter where they are, at least 80% of the time".

Well, now that I type that, I suppose it's not very funny. But arguably more funny than calling it "head".

[+] thailandstartup|15 years ago|reply
>We need a new name for that thing

I've always hated Apple like the pox, but I give them this - they made it fashionable to carry around a pocket computer.

[+] spatulon|15 years ago|reply
Pocket Computer is the term that sprang to mind as well. Eventually we can drop the 'pocket' part when it becomes redundant. Alternatively, shorten it to PC.
[+] sprout|15 years ago|reply
I've actually referred to my Droid as a computer a few times without context. (As in "I'll just check on my computer.")
[+] ugh|15 years ago|reply
The widely used colloquial term for mobile phone is „Handy“ (a fake anglicism) in German. We don’t have that problem.
[+] Zak|15 years ago|reply
"Handy" simply denotes a mobile telephone. While virtually all mobile telephones have technological features that wired telephones did not, it does not capture the difference between a basic mobile phone and a modern smartphone; the former is a phone that may do computer-like things while the latter is a pocket computer that also makes phone calls.

"Smartphone" may not be the best possible name, but it seems to communicate to most people "Android, iPhone or similar".

[+] parbo|15 years ago|reply
In Sweden we usually call it "mobil", so we don't have the problem either.
[+] roc|15 years ago|reply
until consumer heads-up displays crop up and the devices spend most of their time in pockets.
[+] bprater|15 years ago|reply
My dad always told me: 'the phone is there for your convenience, not for for anyone else'. If I don't feel like fielding a call at a given moment, I simply won't pick up. But I'll take texts or emails anytime!

What about emergencies? A certain protocol exists for friends and family in double-ringing the phone which always gets me to pick up immediately.

[+] jedberg|15 years ago|reply
Because my grandmother was insanely cheap, we had this thing where she would call and hang up after one ring, and then we would call her back. Then the phone company got priority ringing, so we just wouldn't pick up when she called.

Anyway, your thing about double-ringing reminded me.

[+] varikin|15 years ago|reply
What about calling them a mobile?
[+] maqr|15 years ago|reply
This seemed glaringly obvious to me, but I guess he wouldn't have had anything to write about then.
[+] chadmalik|15 years ago|reply
Doesn't that just beg the question?
[+] jiganti|15 years ago|reply
I vote for phone. It just has a different definition now, in a generation or so nobody will even remember that it was originally something used solely for voice conversations.
[+] BerislavLopac|15 years ago|reply
If you're a startup working on a mobile-related software or device, the comments there are a whole wealth of the ideas for your brand name... Damn, jeejah.com is taken... ;)
[+] amanuel|15 years ago|reply
> "Granted, there could be some confusion if a head is contemplated as a gift item, but that's a risk I'm willing to take."

That's why it fun to read Scott's stuff. Right there in the middle of a 'serious' discussion on finding a new name for a phone he drops this little LOLbomb.

I think calling it a memex would be interesting as well...going way old school. ;-)

[+] bitwize|15 years ago|reply
"Oooooh, a head-bag, those are chock full of... heady goodness!"
[+] derefr|15 years ago|reply
I like the term "node"—short for "communications node"—as a general term for things you have in your pocket that give you WAN access. An iPhone is a node and a computer (nodeputer? interactive node? smartnode?) An iPod Touch is just a portable computer, and it connects to a MiFi node in my other pocket.
[+] staunch|15 years ago|reply
More people will have "phone" computers than laptop computers so eventually we can just refer to "phones" as computers. Laptops can still be laptops or PCs.
[+] chadmalik|15 years ago|reply
In that light, how about "eartop" or "fingertop"? or maybe "palmtop"? (that one might have some tm issues).
[+] geuis|15 years ago|reply
Call them jeejaws. That phrase in Anathem just so elegantly wrapped up what cellphones really are like.
[+] DotSauce|15 years ago|reply
I was going to suggest this. That novel is so epic. It's actually Jeejah(s).
[+] bitwize|15 years ago|reply
I've heard "joymaker", from an even older SF novel, suggested.
[+] theschwa|15 years ago|reply
Why not just use one of the terms that already in our daily vocabulary like: Cell or Mobile.
[+] j-g-faustus|15 years ago|reply
"Phone" is Greek for "voice", so perhaps a different name would be in order.

But neither "mobile" nor "cell" says anything about voice in particular, so I would think they are suitable terms for "portable communication device connected to a cellular network" even when the device primarily deals with non-voice services.

[+] eru|15 years ago|reply
In formal German you can call phones in general Fernsprecher. A literal translation would be remote talking device.
[+] bdonlan|15 years ago|reply
However "cell" refers to a portion of the infrastructure running the cellular network, so that's not a good option.