top | item 16609885 (no title) aluhut | 8 years ago Participation by elites in neoliberalism was the reason why the term has a negative connotation in the first place... discuss order hn newest lhnz|8 years ago My point is "they don't participate if it's inherently smearing". They are careful about their public selves.This means that they must believe it has become defendable. aluhut|8 years ago I understood you very well. But maybe we are not talking about the same "elites" because I have no idea how you get the idea. They didn't care about the connotation back then. Why should the negativity of it be relevant today?I was thinking of financial elites btw.
lhnz|8 years ago My point is "they don't participate if it's inherently smearing". They are careful about their public selves.This means that they must believe it has become defendable. aluhut|8 years ago I understood you very well. But maybe we are not talking about the same "elites" because I have no idea how you get the idea. They didn't care about the connotation back then. Why should the negativity of it be relevant today?I was thinking of financial elites btw.
aluhut|8 years ago I understood you very well. But maybe we are not talking about the same "elites" because I have no idea how you get the idea. They didn't care about the connotation back then. Why should the negativity of it be relevant today?I was thinking of financial elites btw.
lhnz|8 years ago
This means that they must believe it has become defendable.
aluhut|8 years ago
I was thinking of financial elites btw.