top | item 16610526

(no title)

highd | 8 years ago

Not to mention that it appears they're comparing against networks of the same architecture. If you build your quaternion components with with same number types as your reals you effectively have 4 times the number of parameters, which could be most of the benefit. They should also benchmark against similar architectures with equivalent parameter counts.

discuss

order

gaudetcj|8 years ago

Hi I'm one of the authors of this paper. Sorry if it unclear, but we reduce the number of filters per layer to account for this. The quaternion networks actually have fewer parameters.

highd|8 years ago

Can you provide some technical details on what you do? Do you divide the number of channels on each real layered network by 4? I don't see anything describing this in the paper.