top | item 16639244

(no title)

theobon | 8 years ago

You are assuming that harassment was direct, sending messages to the accusers. My impression is that this was a group chatting privately about the accusers either making fun of them or coordinating actions.

While this can be done through other channels (in person or private cellphone) allowing it on corporate infrastructure without monitoring is not acceptable.

discuss

order

pera|8 years ago

If harassers, as you have mentioned, can simply switch to another channel, then what problem exactly is this measure trying to solve? I'm honestly confused.

guitarbill|8 years ago

Ass-covering. It should've been obvious as soon as HR was mentioned that this isn't about helping employees, harassed or not.

UncleMeat|8 years ago

Friction. Yes they could use PGP messages. But most people are idiots and use the systems that are available and simple. If somebody needs to think "I've got to go through these extra steps to be an asshole" then they might think twice in the first place.

Normal_gaussian|8 years ago

It increases the friction of harrassment

rmc|8 years ago

Because you could just forbid employees from using such other form of communication at work.

ben509|8 years ago

Now the harassers are doing more and more to harass and leaving more evidence behind. And you have a more compelling case, "they were on Slack, they were on email, they were texting, they set up their own ICQ server..."

secstate|8 years ago

What's stopping the harassers from setting up a secondary Slack install for coordination of such nefarious ends?

The only use I can see for this would be evidence after the fact. Surveillance is almost never the proper way to enforce acceptable standards of behavior.

jsjohnst|8 years ago

> What's stopping the harassers from setting up a secondary Slack install for coordination of such nefarious ends?

Company policy for one could be applicable.

You’re missing the point though, what you do with non-company provided tools is held to a different standard from officially blessed and sanctioned ones.

mavdi|8 years ago

In that case, that would be absolutely none of your business. You're making assumptions and jumping to conclusion about what went on.