top | item 16819973 (no title) RazrFalcon | 8 years ago Yes. C++ has all of this in a crippled form. But it doesn't mean that C++ in on par with Rust. discuss order hn newest pjmlp|8 years ago Not from technical perfection point of view, but it is much easier to improve existing codebases than just rewriting the world.One of the things Rust should focus on as productivity improvement is making that migration as easy as possible.Right now I cannot justify from business perspective replacing C++ with Rust on the workflows we still use C++ for. RazrFalcon|8 years ago I'm not saying that you should ditch an existing C++ project.But it doesn't mean that C++ as good as Rust. It's just wrong. load replies (1)
pjmlp|8 years ago Not from technical perfection point of view, but it is much easier to improve existing codebases than just rewriting the world.One of the things Rust should focus on as productivity improvement is making that migration as easy as possible.Right now I cannot justify from business perspective replacing C++ with Rust on the workflows we still use C++ for. RazrFalcon|8 years ago I'm not saying that you should ditch an existing C++ project.But it doesn't mean that C++ as good as Rust. It's just wrong. load replies (1)
RazrFalcon|8 years ago I'm not saying that you should ditch an existing C++ project.But it doesn't mean that C++ as good as Rust. It's just wrong. load replies (1)
pjmlp|8 years ago
One of the things Rust should focus on as productivity improvement is making that migration as easy as possible.
Right now I cannot justify from business perspective replacing C++ with Rust on the workflows we still use C++ for.
RazrFalcon|8 years ago
But it doesn't mean that C++ as good as Rust. It's just wrong.