top | item 16836186 (no title) kenbaylor | 8 years ago You are correct, and they will likely change that or face heavy fines, now that they have lost this case. discuss order hn newest mirimir|8 years ago Really, over this one little case?That would suck. kenbaylor|8 years ago It's been going on since 2010 in the Costeja caseand they lost the case in 2014 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Spain_v_AEPD_and_Mario_...), and 'interpreted it' as 'we'll just limit the results from Europe'. This was a landmark case, and they just keep losing them. load replies (1)
mirimir|8 years ago Really, over this one little case?That would suck. kenbaylor|8 years ago It's been going on since 2010 in the Costeja caseand they lost the case in 2014 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Spain_v_AEPD_and_Mario_...), and 'interpreted it' as 'we'll just limit the results from Europe'. This was a landmark case, and they just keep losing them. load replies (1)
kenbaylor|8 years ago It's been going on since 2010 in the Costeja caseand they lost the case in 2014 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Spain_v_AEPD_and_Mario_...), and 'interpreted it' as 'we'll just limit the results from Europe'. This was a landmark case, and they just keep losing them. load replies (1)
mirimir|8 years ago
That would suck.
kenbaylor|8 years ago
and they lost the case in 2014 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Spain_v_AEPD_and_Mario_...), and 'interpreted it' as 'we'll just limit the results from Europe'. This was a landmark case, and they just keep losing them.