This bill honestly seems pretty well put together. I was wary when I read it went beyond the FCC’s regulations wrt zero-rating, but apparently that’s actually allowed as long as the zero-rating is application-agnostic, which sounds good for that quaint old-fashioned free market competition.
I think it's funny: AT&T: Oh you don't need to do this, silly we're already compliant...no please don't...we mean it, we'll be good... --- if it was something they plan on enforcing anyways, why fight it so damn hard?
To my eye Internet services look like interstate commerce and therefore would be the jurisdiction of the federal government. I'd appreciate it if someone with a little expertise could explain how the law works in this regard.
get ready for rate increases. having to comply with 51 sets of laws and regulations is going to cost money - lawyers, technicians, lost revenue, etc. - and those costs will be passed to consumers. and you'll pay those costs regardless of your political affiliation or Republican's emotions.
LOL, as if any political faction these days is capable of looking beyond the spin an issue settles with and how it interacts with their talking points this week and whether it's a way to get one over on their opponent.
[+] [-] jonathanyc|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] r00fus|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mehrdadn|8 years ago|reply
Anybody know how close to the truth this is? It sounds a bit less likely than I would hope.
[+] [-] l1n|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|8 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] gremlinsinc|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] forapurpose|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jclulow|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] e40|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pkaye|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jamesgeck0|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jeremyt|8 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] slantedview|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] barnesto|8 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kbenson|8 years ago|reply