(no title)
throwaway000021 | 7 years ago
I also believe now that we need at least 2 very large U.S. bases on our soil, and if the U.S. aren't interested then maybe the U.K. or the Europeans.
Expansionist countries could easily see Australia right now as a virtually undefended, resource rich sweet piece of fruit to be plucked, and given that Australia's traditional allies seem to be internally engaged, there's plenty of room for such expansionists to start laying the foundations that will allow them to exert such control in the future.
Guthur|7 years ago
greglindahl|7 years ago
Also worth noting that the force needed to occupy a country is mainly proportional to the population.
Trundle|7 years ago
India and China are also reasonably close.
throwaway000021|7 years ago
All thats needed is to get several thousand armed people to take control of Canberra, Sydney and Melbourne parliament and hold all the politicians under lock and key. And whilst Australia is too stunned to work out what has just happened, land ships and troops in Sydney then Melbourne.
There you have it - control of Australia.
threeseed|7 years ago
And just to show you that they aren't messing around. They just funded the development of a port in Vanuatu which many have suspected as being suitable for future naval purposes:
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/the-great-wharf-from...
greglindahl|7 years ago
threeseed|7 years ago
Higher than Israel, Pakistan and North Korea which all have them.