Saving $5000 per year for 75 years compounded annually at 6.2% would net you a little over $8M. An unremarkable return on an unremarkable savings rate.
You are neglecting inflation. There was no way this secretary was saving $5000 a year 75 years ago - her yearly salary was mostly likely around that amount.
I think it's more the fact that they were a two income family and never had kids. Their apartment was probably paid off and they were one of those couples that was perfectly happy not taking expensive vacations or buying expensive things. Combine that with smart investing and you an amass quite a fortune over a lifetime.
Of course then you are 95 and realize that without descendants about the only thing you can do with the money is give it to a charity and hope they don't squander it.
Actually M&A lawyers know the law, and have a lot more to lose than the average person. So insider trading amongst them is quite rare. Ask around at work and see what your GC thinks about your hypothesis.
Quick script, to show some example numbers on how this could happen (assumes she worked for 75 years, that her salary kept up with annual rate of inflation and she always invested 10%, and a very high annual rate of return of 10%) [1].
Andre_Wanglin|7 years ago
davidgay|7 years ago
CamelCaseName|7 years ago
The same values taken for a 50 year period are only $1.65MM, nothing to sneeze at, but a far cry from $8.2MM.
hunter23|7 years ago
jandrese|7 years ago
Of course then you are 95 and realize that without descendants about the only thing you can do with the money is give it to a charity and hope they don't squander it.
greenyoda|7 years ago
A reputable charity is less likely to squander $8M than one's descendants are.
emdubs|7 years ago
sveng|7 years ago
meric|7 years ago
wjn0|7 years ago
[1] https://gist.github.com/wjn0/67641a83d61e2fe74f8729f65fe4bdb...
asdsa5325|7 years ago
voxadam|7 years ago
[deleted]