Launch HN: Necto (YC W18) – ISP Starter Kit
404 points| montasaurus | 7 years ago
We started our own ISP here in the underserved San Francisco markets of Bayview and Portola, with more neighborhoods to come. If you live in SF, we'd love to be your ISP (https://joinnecto.com). If you're interested in starting an ISP, we're looking for an initial batch of 5 operators. You can learn more about that here: https://nectolab.io .
Our product is a combination of a few important requirements for running an ISP effectively: a centralized Network Operations Center (NOC), a Operational Support System (OSS) to manage the subscribers and get visibility into issues, and an Operator's Handbook that covers the how-to's of running an ISP (both technically and our advice on the business side). Our NOC will handle things like BGP, routing, reachability, hardware issues, upstream connectivity, and distribution provisioning. The OSS supports managing subscribers, diagnosing common issues, and performing installations. Our handbook provides a list Standard Operating Procedures for day-to-day management of the ISP and, in combination with our community of ISP operators, strategies on how to effectively launch and grow an ISP.
We charge an initial setup fee and an ongoing percentage of revenue. The initial setup fee covers us designing your initial network, sourcing your backbone connection, and the cost of the core routing stack. The ongoing percentage of revenue aligns our incentives with our operators and covers monitoring, the NOC, and ongoing enhancements for the software and community. The exact numbers depend on the scale of the network the operators are building.
We're staunch supporters of Net Neutrality and increasing broadband penetration without sacrificing privacy. We don't sell personal information or throttle traffic (and our operators won't either). We believe that the future is in highly localized ISPs competing on service quality. We're excited to tackle this problem because we've had to deal with poor internet service before, and we now know that you can make a great business out of providing better quality access. Our backgrounds are in enterprise automation technology and the home services industry (air conditioning, plumbing, electric). We're happy to answer as many questions about any of this as we can! If you're at all considering starting an ISP in your neighborhood after reading this, let us know at nectolab.io and include your HN username!
Thanks, Ben & Adam
toomuchtodo|7 years ago
I won't mince words: you're asking customers to outsource the core pieces of their business (netops, backhaul, billing) that they should be competent in, which puts them in a precarious position if you exhaust your runway, decide to move on to another venture, or are acquired by a less-than-ideal org.
Full disclosure: Muncipal/coop broadband proponent.
montasaurus|7 years ago
Also, big shout out to Graham (the author of startyourownisp.com). We met, and he's super knowledgeable. I encourage anyone interested to read his guide, it's very good. We don't see our offerings as directly competitive, and share a common goal of increasing connectivity.
grahamburger|7 years ago
gumby|7 years ago
An alternative way to look at this is it's a "white label franchise" business where someone not steeped in the technology can do what they know best, likely acquiring and keeping customers. I don't know if it will work, but I'm interested to see.
> Full disclosure: Muncipal/coop broadband proponent.
Something like this could probably accelerate municipal, coop, and piggyback (e.g. local water district or other small, independent utility) to take advantage of local infrastructure without having to acquire skills in a completely new domain.
CKN23-ARIN|7 years ago
[deleted]
dsl|7 years ago
The really hard part is last-mile connectivity. You are either on someone elses lines (cable, DSL, etc), dealing with NIMBYs to bury your own lines, or working around line of site to do wireless. It isn't clear that you've solved this problem (or even from your website what you are using for last mile).
montasaurus|7 years ago
Just digging into that piece, there are a lot of decisions. Burstable or dedicated? Why are they billing based on 95th percentile? How much bandwidth should I budget per subscriber? The typical uplink quote we've seen has 6 different tables with like 80 different prices on it. If you've bought it before, you know what the tradeoffs are. If you haven't, that's a steep hill to climb just for step 1 of the process.
We deploy fixed wireless here in SF, mainly 60GHz and 5.8GHz. They require line of sight, but something like Baicells could be a good fit for areas where that's more of an issue. It's not just the NIMBYs when you go to hang/bury your own lines, the incumbents will box you out on power poles and generally make things difficult for you.
toomuchtodo|7 years ago
a-dub|7 years ago
That said, I wouldn't say it's "easy." You still need to track your customers through their full lifecycle with you, you still need to provision/audit both locally and in concert with CLECs and you still need to monitor, backup and keep everything up.
Moreover, if you plan to scale out in any way, you need to be principled, lest you end up with enormous flat files filled with bespoke configs that no-one even understands.
kbaker|7 years ago
montasaurus|7 years ago
CKN23-ARIN|7 years ago
BroadcastSunny|7 years ago
Despite that, I'm glad to see that you're doing this even if net neutrality does come back. I remember the days of Earthlink and Mindspring. Now the ISP companies have become "too big to fail" and I'd like to see alternatives.
slovette|7 years ago
That piece of software has been an amazing addition to our WISP here in Colorado. Simon and his team have made extreme strides in provisioning and IPAM management and continue to make bizops more and more turnkey.
The real magic though is the whole thing is VERY API focused. The entire platform can be automated and made more powerful with a little dev time.
We do a ton of 60Ghz (ignitenet), 24Ghz, 11Ghz and 5Ghz (ubnt & mimosa) links to cover about 200 Sq miles. We’ve been mostly following a modified webpass model with redundant PTP and multiple interlinking. A few PTMP hub/spoke exist too where needed (SFH).
We’ve been at this for a few years and have a dedicated lab and geo region that we test all kinds of new ideas and equipment both wireless and new fiber tech (10g GPON, bonded RF).
patrickg_zill|7 years ago
montasaurus|7 years ago
atourgates|7 years ago
I live in a rural area in Idaho, and we've got a pretty great WISP here. But, I know that the owners and employees are close to retirement age, and I've often thought of approaching them to see if they have any plans to sell the business.
How do you handle physical, local network management with your partners? Things like installing hardware customer homes and businesses, managing outages at broadcast sites, and all the rest. Is that totally up to your local partners, or something you provide training/management for on any level?
montasaurus|7 years ago
Let us know if you speak with them--we're interested in having an existing ISP in the batch.
nickreese|7 years ago
yodon|7 years ago
Full disclosure: co-founder of a Seattle-based startup that was invited into the Microsoft Ventures Accelerator and found it an incredibly valuable experience
[0] http://fortune.com/2015/11/16/microsoft-cheap-internet/
montasaurus|7 years ago
fiatjaf|7 years ago
montasaurus|7 years ago
ejanus|7 years ago
csmajorfive|7 years ago
Do you have an operating model for these small ISPs? Specifically I'm curious what the breakeven point is.
montasaurus|7 years ago
willart4food|7 years ago
- how do you provision the last mile? Copper? Fiber? or Wireless?
- Do you rely on the Local Exchanges? or is it on a case-by-case basis?
- Is your typical ISP customer selling to business? Individuals? or is best-fit an apartment complex/business building?
Thank you.
montasaurus|7 years ago
komali2|7 years ago
1. Do you mean Comcast/ATT i.e. is this only a last-mile solution that must connect to some hub of theirs?
2. "We don't sell personal information or throttle traffic (and our operators won't either)" - how do you know this is true now, will be true in the future, and if your operators are comcast/AT&T why did they agree to this? (given that they are hell incarnate and would sell a baby to satan for profit ;) )
montasaurus|7 years ago
Monitoring traffic and throttling it are both network-level interventions that we won't implement or support in a way that can be abused like that. We don't want to expose our operators to the liability of even collecting this type of info.
manav|7 years ago
montasaurus|7 years ago
Each of the cases can work, you just need to make sure you're running the right kind of ISP for the market.
lsiebert|7 years ago
I see nothing about limiting data retention, not selling member data, or refusing to provide data voluntarily.
https://www.sonic.com/privacy-policy
montasaurus|7 years ago
icedchai|7 years ago
I'm real skeptical that this is profitable on the low end.
uniclaude|7 years ago
Quick question regarding your business model. Do you intend to charge forever, or is there any option for your customers to get out after the setup if they decide to grow their business with their own resources?
arrel|7 years ago
It would be great to see a blog post about how joinnecto.com got off the ground. "Be the savior the Internet needs and start your own ISP" is a good slogan, but "Start a great business and save the Internet in the process" seems even better.
djweis|7 years ago
Next time you fly over the midwest, look at density. If you can see your neighbor, you're probably not underserved.
terravion|7 years ago
whalesalad|7 years ago
I see that your own ISP relies on PPPoE... is that a decision you intend to rely on for the necto lab customers (other ISPs) or was that something you had to do specifically in your own case? Have you seen any downsides to that? I know as a consumer PPPoE is kind of a pain in the butt.
montasaurus|7 years ago
Nice catch on the PPPoE. Our gear didn't support Option 82 at the time, but now that it does, we're switching to DHCP. PPPoE is definitely a pain in the butt.
rjsw|7 years ago
amelius|7 years ago
stefantheard|7 years ago
xur17|7 years ago
It's interesting to see you list apartment complexes as one of the target markets - I've always wondered why more complexes don't just provide internet access as a perk instead of outsourcing to Time Warner, AT&T, etc.
deepnotderp|7 years ago
Is this still bay area only or are you ready to expand to other areas?
z3t4|7 years ago
SandersAK|7 years ago
unknown|7 years ago
[deleted]
unknown|7 years ago
[deleted]
goatherders|7 years ago
wasd|7 years ago
dyeje|7 years ago
RyanShook|7 years ago
WrtCdEvrydy|7 years ago
kizer|7 years ago
notyourday|7 years ago
If one cannot figure out how to solve all these problems himself or herself that ISP will go out of business in a matter of months.
martinald|7 years ago
gonzo|7 years ago
osrec|7 years ago
montasaurus|7 years ago
akskos|7 years ago
wittedhaddock|7 years ago
unknown|7 years ago
[deleted]
Rotdhizon|7 years ago
jarito|7 years ago