top | item 17071000 (no title) brockf | 7 years ago No reason to oversimplify and ignore a lot of important details — they're doing that for you! discuss order hn newest cs702|7 years ago The original link was to the actual paper[a], not the blog post!A moderator, dang, changed the link after I posted my comment; see his comment [b] elsewhere in this thread.Had the original link been to the blog post, I agree, there would have been no need to simplify.[a] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-018-0147-8[b] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17068449 alex_duf|7 years ago I'm quite happy with the blog post, I don't have enough background to understand the paper
cs702|7 years ago The original link was to the actual paper[a], not the blog post!A moderator, dang, changed the link after I posted my comment; see his comment [b] elsewhere in this thread.Had the original link been to the blog post, I agree, there would have been no need to simplify.[a] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-018-0147-8[b] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17068449 alex_duf|7 years ago I'm quite happy with the blog post, I don't have enough background to understand the paper
alex_duf|7 years ago I'm quite happy with the blog post, I don't have enough background to understand the paper
cs702|7 years ago
A moderator, dang, changed the link after I posted my comment; see his comment [b] elsewhere in this thread.
Had the original link been to the blog post, I agree, there would have been no need to simplify.
[a] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-018-0147-8
[b] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17068449
alex_duf|7 years ago