(no title)
lordlarm | 7 years ago
I.e. Facebook _could_ argue that users would have to have their data collected and analysed, as this would enable them to sell ads which in turn is their core interest.
Another example could be automatic enrollment into newsletters or data collection/analyzation with the option to opt-out by going to settings. You don't _have_ to give users the explicit consent checkbox during signup if you can defend the activity by it being in your legitimate interests.
This article goes into more detail: https://medium.com/mydata/five-loopholes-in-the-gdpr-367443c...
tazjin|7 years ago
I'm finding it difficult to believe that they can come up with a "legitimate interest" for all of those that would also actually hold up in court.
BonesJustice|7 years ago
eli|7 years ago
dmitriid|7 years ago
piokoch|7 years ago
I am not big Facebook fun, but I understand that they business model relays on selling targeted ads, so they have 'legitimate interest' to track their users, because otherwise they would have to go out of business - I don't think it should be possible to force someone to radically change business model because of GDPR.
The interesting part is that GDPR is something that will be enforced an the countries level, so each country might have different interpretation of that clause and I see that there will be competition among countries who will offer 'better' interpretation from business perspective.
bjl|7 years ago