(no title)
_yosefk | 7 years ago
The same applies to the lawyer's experience. If you're an individual inventor, you're gonna look for the lawyer with the best experience and the law firm with the best price (and IMO you're right in that the $1000/hour lawyers aren't necessarily the best for you.) If you work for a company, someone will find a lawyer to deal with your stuff and the lawyer will behave very confidently, in a "business as usual" kind of manner, when you explain them the basics and they keep not getting it, and you might naturally assume that's how things are supposed to work, when instead what you should do is push back against whoever set you up with this lawyer and insist on getting one with relevant experience.
jacques_chester|7 years ago
My feelings are mostly that $50,000 is a lot of money, no matter how one slices it.
> but it's not an urban legend, it's real legal advice I heard from real lawyers.
What I was trying unsuccessfully to convey is that what a company might do as a legal tactic is not necessarily a legal necessity. I was a shitty law student before I dropped out of it, but I did learn that taking advice from people in a bar, or from Uncle Frank who heard it from TV, or HN for that matter, is a chancy business.
I generally agree that it is always worth knowing that lawyers specialise and that it's no crime to ask for a specialist.