> GitHub will retain its developer-first ethos, operate independently and remain an open platform
> Nat Friedman will become the CEO of GitHub
As far as acquisition news goes, this is pretty good news. I think the one thing I was hoping for was autonomous operation from GitHub, and we're getting that. Nat created Xamarin & by extension a large swathe of the Mono project -- which means that his heart is certainly aligned in the right spot. He sounds like an excellent CEO grab, and it wouldn't surprise me if this is more of the deal than it's being portrayed as. GitHub has needed a CEO for a while, and Nat at the helm is a great person for that.
I'm optimistic that, as long as GitHub remains an independent business unit (ala Heroku at Salesforce), then it'll actually be a good thing. Let's hope it stays that way.
If there is one thing that I've learned from watching tech acquisitions up close for way too many years then it is that you should not put too much stock into words spoke by execs of companies around or immediately after an acquisition.
you do realize that's just PR talk right? Most of their money-making products and services are far from being open source, so let's tone down the grandiloquent claims a little.
Comments like these leave me no hope for the future. Even with a history like Microsofts, people are quick to forgive instead of learning from mistakes.
I didn't even think PR works on people but it does and it's sad to see it.
If they changed so much, let them reverse their claim that APIs are copyrightable, stop patent shakedowns (like on Android and etc.) and start supporting major FOSS cross platform initiatives like Vulkan. Until then I'll retain my skepticism about how much they have really changed.
They haven't changed to the positive, they have switched to other evils. They took Google's evil (all that spying), and a bit of Apple's evil (disposable hardware, Windows S walled garden).
Also interesting: the laptop in the slides is a MacBook, not a laptop running Windows. It might look like a generic aluminium device, but see the window decorations...
Atom has been leagues behind VS Code for a quite a while. Even with an acquisition I don’t see it ever winning that fight. Too much baggage in the underlying architecture.
It just benefits large companies, not small ones. Now Microsoft is able to slam a deal with Github in the offer (which every company is using) to sell Azure. Brilliant!
My thoughts also, something to dethrone AWS. Azure is actually doing surprisingly well in Big Enterprise. But in the seas of Small Medium Coprs and Dev houses they have little to Zero penetration.
The degree of gullibility in these threads is unexpected. You'd think the hacker community would be vaccinated against PR by now but it seems to work just fine.
Next up: "Our incredible journey".
When it all comes crashing down, don't say you weren't warned.
$ git push ...
remote: Resolving deltas: 100% (2/2), completed with 2 local objects.
remote: error: GH013: Your push could infringe someone's copyright.
remote: If you believe this is a false positive (e.g., it's yours, open
remote: source, not copyrightable, subject to exceptions) contact us:
remote: https://github.com/contact
remote: We're sorry for interrupting your work, but automated copyright
remote: filters are mandated by the EU's Article 13.
To github.com/vollmera/atom.git
! [remote rejected] patch-1 -> patch-1 (push declined due to article 13 filters)
The thought that Satya Nadella, who joined Microsoft in 1992 and then steadily climbed his way to the top would be a better, more moral person than the "old guard" is kind of funny.
He's just younger and less out of touch than Gates (and particularly Balmer).
What was Github's current valuation? It seems that the last round valued them at $2b in 2015. Around ~3x multiple on the last round (~7.5b$). Hopefully, the employees are all happy!
I generally agree with you. But just so you know, in this case if you enable a few scripts, a download button appears and you can read the file in libreoffice or whatever you use.
[+] [-] Shank|7 years ago|reply
> GitHub will retain its developer-first ethos, operate independently and remain an open platform
> Nat Friedman will become the CEO of GitHub
As far as acquisition news goes, this is pretty good news. I think the one thing I was hoping for was autonomous operation from GitHub, and we're getting that. Nat created Xamarin & by extension a large swathe of the Mono project -- which means that his heart is certainly aligned in the right spot. He sounds like an excellent CEO grab, and it wouldn't surprise me if this is more of the deal than it's being portrayed as. GitHub has needed a CEO for a while, and Nat at the helm is a great person for that.
I'm optimistic that, as long as GitHub remains an independent business unit (ala Heroku at Salesforce), then it'll actually be a good thing. Let's hope it stays that way.
[+] [-] jacquesm|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ckastner|7 years ago|reply
It's really amazing how much Microsoft has changed (to the positive) since Ballmer stepped down as CEO.
[+] [-] ekianjo|7 years ago|reply
you do realize that's just PR talk right? Most of their money-making products and services are far from being open source, so let's tone down the grandiloquent claims a little.
[+] [-] frou_dh|7 years ago|reply
Even if it's true, I humbly ask that we move beyond the fawning.
[+] [-] some_account|7 years ago|reply
I didn't even think PR works on people but it does and it's sad to see it.
[+] [-] zwischenzug|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] shmerl|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] blauditore|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] GuB-42|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] baybal2|7 years ago|reply
>It's really amazing how much Microsoft has changed (to the positive) since Ballmer stepped down as CEO.
Protip: this is a lie
[+] [-] cyxxon|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] manigandham|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|7 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] 11235813213455|7 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] ConfusedDog|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mrleiter|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] JakeWesorick|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] narvind|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dblooman|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] koolba|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] anamoulous|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] thelastidiot|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ksec|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cakes|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sharathr|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jacquesm|7 years ago|reply
Next up: "Our incredible journey".
When it all comes crashing down, don't say you weren't warned.
[+] [-] pshc|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] foobarbazetc|7 years ago|reply
This is not a good thing in any way. None.
If it saved GitHub from bankruptcy or something then fine, but acquisitions like this rarely work out.
[+] [-] jblow|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] walterbell|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] falcon620|7 years ago|reply
He's just younger and less out of touch than Gates (and particularly Balmer).
[+] [-] hatred|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|7 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] skierscott|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] spiderPig|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] inetknght|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] aerovistae|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dingo_bat|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bo1024|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] developerdanny|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pojntfx|7 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] pojntfx|7 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] falcon620|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] gojomo|7 years ago|reply