(no title)
venning | 7 years ago
You are describing entirely legal actions. Sabotage and (this form of) industrial espionage are very much illegal. There's quite a difference there.
> a few $100k is pocket change for these guys
But a few billion dollars of market cap and a few years of jail time are the price of being found guilty of what Musk is insinuating.
That's not a small leap.
Johnny555|7 years ago
If I stood to lose $100M, I wouldn't do the dirty work myself, I'd hire someone else to do it for whom taking that risk for $100K (or whatever) is worth the risk - that could be several years (tax-free) pay for some people.
I'd use several levels of anonymization or maybe redirection to try to keep my identity hidden (and I doubt I'd be successful, but it takes a certain level of arrogance to hire someone to sabotage a company because you bet against it and might be losing)
elihu|7 years ago
It would be a lot harder to plausibly deny paying some third party for explicit sabotage; as far as I know, companies don't normally pay third parties to cause harm to a competitor for legitimate business reasons.
madaxe_again|7 years ago
smadge|7 years ago