top | item 17425167

Debugging Serverless Apps: from monitoring invocations to observing systems

70 points| n0debotanist | 7 years ago |read.iopipe.com | reply

12 comments

order
[+] Myztiq|7 years ago|reply
Identifying cold-starts is a huge win here, using something to keep your lambdas warm is important for user-facing functionality. That functionality alone makes a compelling feature.
[+] golangnews|7 years ago|reply
I don't really understand this - if you need to 'keep your lambdas warm' why not just run them as a process?

There seems to be a lot of book-keeping and ritual for something which is supposed to just let you focus on the important bits of code, without worrying about how it runs.

[+] vageli|7 years ago|reply
Couldn't this be solved with CloudWatch events?
[+] cmjqol|7 years ago|reply
They could at least have a decent pricing. 299$ / Month for this is insulting knowing AWS X-Ray is built in Lambda and does it for Free.

Clearly I do not take any startups working in Serverless seriously if they don't have a serverless pricing themselves.

Serverless is not just Lambda. It's an entire philosphy and pricing model that goes with it . Here it's the exact opposite.

[+] ewindisch|7 years ago|reply
There's a free tier and we're happy to discussing pricing privately. Startups, individuals, open source projects are dear to our hearts and we want to make the product accessible to those that need it.
[+] Herald_MJ|7 years ago|reply
I agree. I have only just heard of this product, but can immediately see it would be extremely useful to me. Sadly, I can say 100% that I can not justify this kind of spend on a single operational analytics tool. For that reason, I probably won't even try it.
[+] bradknowles|7 years ago|reply
Yeah, except X-Ray doesn't actually do a whole lot for you.

If the product from iopipe does more, then they should be able to charge more for it.

Whether it's worth $299/month more is an open question, however.

[+] k__|7 years ago|reply
At least they could also have serverless pricing.