Headline: "Apple fans are returning their new MacBook Pros that cost a minimum of $2,800 because they can't reach the advertised speeds"
Actual data: two Reddit comments that say they're going to return their MacBooks
What's wrong with the headline "Youtuber finds New MacBook Pros Not Performing as Advertised" or "Youtuber finds Cooling Issues with High Performance MacBook"?
It's basically useless to read headlines from most online news sources these days.
A few big-name tech websites already confirmed they are investigating the claims and will publish their findings. So we should have some (mostly) impartial conclusions on the topic soon-ish.
We have seen this pattern over and over again. Remember Apple's Q2, where nearly all analyst were negative. Outrage and pessimism were rampant on HN and Reddit. The vast minority complain the loudest while the vast majority go about their lives and work using Apple products.
What's up with Apple? Seems to me like they should have just dropped the i9 option altogether, since they couldn't make it work. It just further torpedoes their fading reputation for being able to build top-notch hardware.
They are re-living their 2003-2004 period when the IBM PPC G5 CPU was way too hot and power hungry to put in the PowerBook and it needed water cooling in the PowerMac. Back then their solution was to switch to Intel CPUs. Now it's probably going to be to switch to in-house designed ARM CPUs.
I think the comment that they can't build top-notch hardware isn't entirely true. Airpods really made an impression. We also need to count the fact that the entire PC laptop market is in some kind of limbo. Few tried touch and then hybrid then detachable. At least Apple is still kicking in the game I'd say.
Geekbenchmark runs it tests in bursts with short delays between them to allow for the SoC to dissipate heat. They implemented that so laptops and cellphones wouldn't overheat, or thermally throttle while running the benchmark.
Surely, Apple saw these issues in their internal tests. I don't understand how Apple (or any other company that does something similar to this) decides to release the product knowing all of the issues beforehand.
[+] [-] wilsonnb2|7 years ago|reply
Actual data: two Reddit comments that say they're going to return their MacBooks
What's wrong with the headline "Youtuber finds New MacBook Pros Not Performing as Advertised" or "Youtuber finds Cooling Issues with High Performance MacBook"?
It's basically useless to read headlines from most online news sources these days.
[+] [-] close04|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] conatus|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mcountryman|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nodesocket|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] aksss|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jiveturkey|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] greglindahl|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] 394549|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] close04|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] amrrs|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jasonmp85|7 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] bluedino|7 years ago|reply
https://www.geekbench.com/blog/2018/07/macbook-pro-mid-2018-...
[+] [-] valarauca1|7 years ago|reply
https://www.xda-developers.com/geekbench-ceo-fireside-chat-p...
I get that Geekbenchmark is extremely accessible, but it is not rigorous.
Citing a benchmark that's designed to avoid thermal issues, as proof a chip doesn't have thermal issues is just bad.
[+] [-] karanlyons|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tjoff|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] limonkufu|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ricardobeat|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] JudasGoat|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] aparashk|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] newscracker|7 years ago|reply
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.yahoo.com/amphtml/finance/n...
It looks like a (AMP) copy of a (AMP) copy of a web page. Just https://www.yahoo.com/amphtml/finance/news/apple-fans-return... or https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/apple-fans-returning-macb... would work.
[+] [-] tjoff|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sctb|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] AndersSandvik|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sgarrity|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|7 years ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] bufferoverflow|7 years ago|reply