In my field (computational biophysics), it's pretty common practice to post published code on a git repository. Code used to produce published results absolutely should be accessible.
I'm not in academia so maybe I'm being flippant, but what is even the point of a paper whose results can't be reproduced? Are you really advancing knowledge in any meaningful sense if someone can't repeat what you did?
yiyus|7 years ago
Although I agree with this sentiment, I think that if this was a requirement we would not get much more code but much less papers.
umanwizard|7 years ago