[628C6l0]

That's just the art of writing headlines. How else do they generate online conversation except by stating it in a obviously flawed way provoking people like you to point out the flaw and people with a penchant for "charity" to come to their defense, and so on and so forth?

Why are we still falling for this crap?

[solarkraft]

I have never thought about it like this. Thanks and please keep pointing it out!

[uvatbc]

> Why are we still falling for this crap?

We fall for this because a subset of us has been provoked to point out the obvious flaw in the headline or the summary and another subset has been provoked into defending the part that isn't flawed.

I alternated between feeling like this was a question worth answering and feeling like a dick for answering this with your own words.

[628C6l0]

I mean, it was a rhetorical question, which by definition is a question asked not to elicit an answer but to make a point.