Also, "LEGO Technic" is an ill-defined term. The various kits contain an repertoire of custom pupose-designed pieces whose category appears to be open-ended. It seems that almost any conceivable chunk of plastic whatsoever (or perhaps another material) could be included a "LEGO Technic" kit. Thus if something is built out of "LEGO Technic", what exactly does that mean? It needs to be qualified, like built only with the pieces available in a particular kit available to consumers (as many instances of that kit as required).
Building anything strong out of Lego is an interesting challenge. I built a speaker stand that's basically a suspension bridge (using fishing line). A piece of wood would have done the job better.
Over 1,000,000 LEGO Technic elements in total
339 types of LEGO Technic elements used
No glue used in the assembly
Total weight: 1,500 kg
Engine contains:
2,304 LEGO Power Functions motors
4,032 LEGO Technic gear wheels
2,016 LEGO Technic cross axles
Theoretical performance of 5.3 HP
Estimated torque of 92 Nm
Functional rear spoiler (using both LEGO Power Functions and pneumatics)
Functional speedometer built entirely from LEGO Technic elements
13,438 man hours used on development and construction
Edit:
images are meh, just press shots. Was hoping for more on how it was built
"...using 58 types of Technic custom-made elements", anyone have a information on what those pieces are? They really spent an incedible amount of hours and effort on this. 13k+ man hours...
Where does one get these Technic pieces? There seem to be a bunch of pre-made sets but I don't see a generic kit with some motors and most often used bits.
> images are meh, just press shots. Was hoping for more on how it was built
If you scroll to the bottom of the page there's a few links to "raw video clips" and "how we did it". I'm downloading them now but the names of the files sound like they're exactly what you want.
I can't understand how this was done without glue. Sure they must have used something to secure the initial blocks to the steel frame, but nothing afterwards?
stock LEGO in sets is around 10 cents per piece. technics are more expensive. Looking at Ebay, it looks like 30-50 cents on average. You are looking at $200K to $400K for the 1M Technics pieces. They said the motors cost $70K. Say up to $500K for LEGO including custom elements.
Fascinating stuff and a pretty amazing accomplishment! Good job Lego.
I've built a number of robots out of Lego Technic pieces and the only way to keep them together was often to glue pieces together. There was a MIT interstitial class (6.270) that was pretty influential in the hobby robots scene during the late 80s and one of the fallouts of that was a great building techniques guide that was notes on how to make things like power plants and load supporting beams.
That said, supporting the weight of a person and a car in the air across the distance between the front and read axles would have seemed pretty impossible to me. Now if you looked underneath and there was a row of wheels keeping the middle of the car supported that would not have surprised me. And then a top speed of 20km/h ? That is almost 20' or 6m/second, that is fast for even a small Lego car much less a huge one.
> supporting the weight of a person and a car in the air across the distance between the front and read axles would have seemed pretty impossible to me
Yeah, there is a core steel chassis for that. The main LEGO stuff is the body and engine.
If you're not a person who's spent much time with legos, it might be hard to grasp why this is considered an "engineering feat". LEGO is a system of modular building after all, right?
However, the kind of weight that 1,000,000 Legos is (in this case, north of 3,300 pounds) means that they had to use pieces, none of which (I believe) exceed 8" in length, to form the support structure of this vehicle. I would _love_ to see the "chassis" of this thing. Probably some gigantic rail structures holding it all together.
https://www.lego.com/en-us/themes/technic/bugatti-chiron/med... has a link to a "How We Did It" video. There are clips of the chassis and some of the parts that weren't Lego. It shouldn't detract from the feat; the motor is a matrix of Technic motors, the door hinges are Technic pieces, and the skin was adjustable with a tool that also was made of Technic parts.
For some reason the video widgets are unclickable for me on firefox, so here's the direct link to the video for anyone else who might've had the problem
You'd probably be torn to shreds in the lego one by the flying pieces and/or die when you try to leave the car and step on the million pieces lying around.
Joking aside, isn't it weird for LEGO to associate itself with a gaz-guzzler while simultaneously trying to distance itself from fossil fuel-based materials? Does anyone know if there's a commercial deal behind this project?
I am sure you've read before if all modern tools and factories were to disappear we would need to rebuild almost from scratch because you need more precise tools to build even more precise ones. In that vein:
> There was an extra electric screwdriver build to adjust the cylinder
pistons. It is made completely out of LEGO Technic pieces.
It was needed because an actual screwdriver has too much torque.
The LEGO one uses Power Functions motor, simple gearbox and
custom-designed switch.
Good question. A Bugatti Chiron MSRP is about 2.5MM, the lego version could be more expensive, if you add all the bricks, the steel frame, the (real) Chiron wheels (40k for the set, I estimate) and the 13,500 (!) hours of work it could get really expensive, really fast.
I hope they capitalize on it more and produce a few videos with build walkthroughs and engineering behind it.
For all its "markety" feel, there's a lot to learn and engage folks interested in building with first principles in mind.
[+] [-] kozak|7 years ago|reply
It says that the car is not built entirely from LEGO parts: there is a steel frame, axles, and many other non-LEGO things in it.
[+] [-] kazinator|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] skybrian|7 years ago|reply
Building anything strong out of Lego is an interesting challenge. I built a speaker stand that's basically a suspension bridge (using fishing line). A piece of wood would have done the job better.
[+] [-] app4soft|7 years ago|reply
So, it's look like correct title for this news should be:
LEGO built a life-size, drivable Bugatti that consist on less than 95% from over a million Technic pieces[0]
[0] https://www.lego.com/en-us/aboutus/news-room/2018/august/tec...
[+] [-] tda|7 years ago|reply
Some facts:
Edit: images are meh, just press shots. Was hoping for more on how it was built[+] [-] masklinn|7 years ago|reply
Though no build detail shots.
[+] [-] tda|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] foobarian|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tetrep|7 years ago|reply
If you scroll to the bottom of the page there's a few links to "raw video clips" and "how we did it". I'm downloading them now but the names of the files sound like they're exactly what you want.
[+] [-] seanalltogether|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cloudwizard|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mey|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kmonad|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] pcurve|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ourmandave|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lodi|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] drcongo|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ChuckMcM|7 years ago|reply
I've built a number of robots out of Lego Technic pieces and the only way to keep them together was often to glue pieces together. There was a MIT interstitial class (6.270) that was pretty influential in the hobby robots scene during the late 80s and one of the fallouts of that was a great building techniques guide that was notes on how to make things like power plants and load supporting beams.
That said, supporting the weight of a person and a car in the air across the distance between the front and read axles would have seemed pretty impossible to me. Now if you looked underneath and there was a row of wheels keeping the middle of the car supported that would not have surprised me. And then a top speed of 20km/h ? That is almost 20' or 6m/second, that is fast for even a small Lego car much less a huge one.
[+] [-] edraferi|7 years ago|reply
Yeah, there is a core steel chassis for that. The main LEGO stuff is the body and engine.
[+] [-] miohtama|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Scarblac|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sizzzzlerz|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] dclowd9901|7 years ago|reply
However, the kind of weight that 1,000,000 Legos is (in this case, north of 3,300 pounds) means that they had to use pieces, none of which (I believe) exceed 8" in length, to form the support structure of this vehicle. I would _love_ to see the "chassis" of this thing. Probably some gigantic rail structures holding it all together.
[+] [-] bgutierrez|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jonknee|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cududa|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] PeterisP|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ashleyn|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mikkelam|7 years ago|reply
http://legoexternal.23video.com/v.ihtml/player.html?token=96...
[+] [-] kaffeemitsahne|7 years ago|reply
https://www.lego.com/en-us/themes/technic/bugatti-chiron/med...
The patterns of the bodywork are ingenious and quite pretty as well.
[+] [-] felipemnoa|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bognition|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] zaarn|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] em-bee|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] lihaciudaniel|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] crispyambulance|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] sandworm101|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Radle|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rcMgD2BwE72F|7 years ago|reply
Joking aside, isn't it weird for LEGO to associate itself with a gaz-guzzler while simultaneously trying to distance itself from fossil fuel-based materials? Does anyone know if there's a commercial deal behind this project?
[0] https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/31/business/energy-environme...
[+] [-] chx|7 years ago|reply
> There was an extra electric screwdriver build to adjust the cylinder pistons. It is made completely out of LEGO Technic pieces. It was needed because an actual screwdriver has too much torque. The LEGO one uses Power Functions motor, simple gearbox and custom-designed switch.
[+] [-] pbhjpbhj|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] LeonM|7 years ago|reply
[+] [-] escoundel|7 years ago|reply