top | item 18007385 (no title) dmcclurg | 7 years ago The complexity of this problem is absurd. If the biker precisely know the terrain then he is capable of knowing where he is in that terrain. This is the basis of terrain-association. discuss order hn newest dmcclurg|7 years ago A hiker, I mean. The distinction is not important. rini17|7 years ago They can't see the terrain because of the trees.Sure, in nature there are always some clues, but then it's more orienteering than geometry problem. caf|7 years ago Consider it a "lost in an ocean" problem instead then.
dmcclurg|7 years ago A hiker, I mean. The distinction is not important. rini17|7 years ago They can't see the terrain because of the trees.Sure, in nature there are always some clues, but then it's more orienteering than geometry problem. caf|7 years ago Consider it a "lost in an ocean" problem instead then.
rini17|7 years ago They can't see the terrain because of the trees.Sure, in nature there are always some clues, but then it's more orienteering than geometry problem.
dmcclurg|7 years ago
rini17|7 years ago
Sure, in nature there are always some clues, but then it's more orienteering than geometry problem.
caf|7 years ago